Former FBI Director Robert Mueller named Special Counsel for Russia investigation

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
Robert Mueller, Former F.B.I. Director, Is Named Special Counsel for Russia Investigation
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department appointed Robert S. Mueller III, a former F.B.I. director, as special counsel on Wednesday to oversee the investigation into ties between President Trump’s campaign and Russian officials, dramatically raising the legal and political stakes in an affair that has threatened to engulf Mr. Trump’s 118-day-old presidency.
  • The decision, by the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, came after a cascade of damaging developments for Mr. Trump in recent days, including his abrupt dismissal of the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, and the subsequent disclosure that Mr. Trump asked Mr. Comey to drop the investigation of his former national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn.
  • Mr. Rosenstein, who wrote a memo that the White House initially cited as the rationale for Mr. Comey’s dismissal, had been under escalating pressure from Democrats, and even some Republicans, to appoint a special counsel.
  • By appointing Mr. Mueller, a former federal prosecutor with an unblemished reputation who once stood up to President George W. Bush on the legality of his domestic wiretapping program, Mr. Rosenstein could alleviate questions about the government’s capacity to investigate the swirl of questions surrounding the Trump campaign and the Russians.
  • Mr. Rosenstein said in a statement that he concluded that “it is in the public interest for me to exercise my authorities and appoint a special counsel to assume responsibility for this matter.”
  • “My decision is not a finding that crimes have been committed or that any prosecution is warranted,” Mr. Rosenstein added. “I have made no such determination.”
  • In a statement, Mr. Trump said, “As I have stated many times, a thorough investigation will confirm what we already know — there was no collusion between my campaign and any foreign entity. I look forward to this matter concluding quickly. In the meantime, I will never stop fighting for the people and the issues that matter most to the future of our country.”
  • Mr. Rosenstein’s announcement came on a day when Republican lawmakers joined calls for Mr. Comey to testify publicly, with some committee chairmen requesting he appear before their panels and share more information about his encounters with Mr. Trump. Lawmakers also asked the F.B.I. to turn over the memo that Mr. Comey is said to have written that suggested the president asked him to quash the investigation into Mr. Flynn.
  • While Mr. Mueller remains answerable to Mr. Rosenstein — and by extension, the president — he will have greater autonomy to run an investigation than a United States attorney.
  • As a special counsel, Mr. Mueller can choose whether to consult with or inform the Justice Department about his investigation as it goes forward. He is authorized to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump,” according to Mr. Rosenstein’s order naming him to the post, as well as other matters that “may arise directly from the investigation.” He is also empowered to press criminal charges, and he can request additional resources subject to the review of an assistant attorney general.
  • Mr. Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions were notified only after Mr. Rosenstein signed the order on Wednesday afternoon. Mr. Sessions was at the White House on an unrelated matter.
  • Mr. Rosenstein, who until recently was United States attorney in Maryland, took control of the investigation because Mr. Sessions recused himself after acknowledging he did not disclose meetings with the Russian ambassador to Washington, Sergey I. Kislyak, when Mr. Sessions was an adviser to the Trump campaign.
  • As the announcement was being made, Mr. Rosenstein and the acting director of the F.B.I., Andrew G. McCabe, were briefing the leaders of the Senate and the House and the heads of the congressional intelligence committees. The lawmakers said nothing afterward.
  • It was only the second time that the Justice Department has named a special counsel. The first was in 1999, the year the law creating the position took effect. Attorney General Janet Reno appointed John Danforth, a former Republican senator from Missouri, to investigate the botched federal raid on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Tex., in 1993 that killed 76 people.
  • Mr. Mueller’s appointment was hailed by Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill, who view him as one of the most credible law enforcement officials in the country.
  • Senator Ben Sasse, a Nebraska Republican and a member of the Judiciary Committee, said Mr. Mueller’s “record, character, and trustworthiness have been lauded for decades by Republicans and Democrats alike.”
  • Senator Ben Cardin, Democrat of Maryland and the ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said the “choice of Robert Mueller was solid and shows the seriousness Mr. Rosenstein brought to this decision. Rather than ‘make this go away’, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein has taken an important step toward restoring the credibility of the D.O.J. and F.B.I. in this most serious matter.”
  • Mr. Mueller served both Democratic and Republican presidents. President Barack Obama asked him to stay on beyond the normal 10-year term until he appointed Mr. Comey in 2013, the only time a modern-day F.B.I. director’s tenure has been extended.
  • Mr. Mueller and Mr. Comey are close — a relationship forged while standing up to a president’s use of executive power. Mr. Mueller backed up Mr. Comey, then the deputy attorney general, in March 2004 after he threatened to resign when the White House overruled the Justice Department finding that domestic wiretapping without a court order was unconstitutional.
  • “He’s an absolutely superb choice,” said Kathryn Ruemmler, a former prosecutor and White House counsel under Mr. Obama. “He will just do a completely thorough investigation without regard to public pressure or political pressure.”
  • Mr. Mueller is expected to announce his resignation from the law firm WilmerHale. The firm employs lawyers for Mr. Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and his former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort.
  • In a statement, Mr. Mueller said, “I accept this responsibility and will discharge it to the best of my ability.”
  • In recent years, Mr. Mueller investigated the N.F.L.’s handling of accusations that a Baltimore Ravens running back, Ray Rice, assaulted his fiancée. He also mediated a $14.7 billion settlement with Volkswagen on claims stemming from its diesel emissions cheating scandal. Last month, he was named to oversee a nearly $1 billion fund set up to compensate victims of defective airbags manufactured by Takata of Japan.
  • The appointment is certain to soothe nerves at the F.B.I., where agents have felt under siege amid Mr. Comey’s firing and Mr. Trump’s repeated criticism of the Russia investigation.
  • Mr. Mueller is known inside the bureau for his gruff, exacting management style — and for saving the institution. After the Sept. 11 attacks, there were calls to break up the F.B.I. and create a separate domestic intelligence agency. Mr. Mueller, who came to the agency just one week before the attacks, beat back those efforts and is credited with building the modern F.B.I. He led investigations into Al Qaeda while transforming the agency into a key part of the national security infrastructure.
  • Mr. Mueller is renowned inside the Justice Department for being a senior prosecutor under George H.W. Bush, and then returning years later as a working-level prosecutor in Washington.
  • “He came in as a line assistant and he was legendary. He was the first guy there every single day,” said Preston Burton, a Washington defense lawyer who served in the United States attorney’s office with Mr. Mueller. “All of a sudden he’s doing street crime? Literal street crime. He’s inexhaustible. He’s the embodiment of integrity.”
https://apple.news/A9OFR66q4TD-e5oO_Mh-AKA
 

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
A special prosecutor on Russia is an all or nothing deal for Republicans
The decision by deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to appoint ex-FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel to oversee the federal investigation into Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 election and the possibility of collusion with Donald Trump's campaign officials amounts to a pushing of all the political chips into the center of the table.
  • It is, without question, a massive political risk for the Trump administration as well as Congressional Republicans — and a risk undertaken by a man in Rosenstein who hasn't been on the job for a month yet. (The decision to appoint a special counsel comes from the Attorney General. But Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from any and all 2016 investigations due to his failure to disclose two separate meetings with Russia Ambassador Sergey Kisylak during the course of 2016. Therefore, the decision on a special prosecutor fell to Rosenstein.)
  • What had become clear over the past few days — between Trump divulging classified information to two top Russian officials, allegations he had urged then FBI Director James Comey to drop the investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn's ties to Russia and the recused Sessions vetting candidates to succeed Comey — was that no ruling that would come out of the ongoing FBI investigation would be accepted by the entire country. The congressional investigations into the matter are expected to continue although it remains to be seen how active they will be given the likely deference given to Mueller.
  • The appointment of Mueller opens up the possibility that, regardless of the ruling he reaches, the country might accept it as unbiased, fair and factual. (The pick drew widespread bipartisan support from members of the House and Senate.) In short: It might allow the country to move on.
  • "What I have determined is that based upon the unique circumstances, the public interest requires me to place this investigation under the authority of a person who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command," Rosenstein said in a statement announcing the decision.
  • Of course, the unimpeachability of Mueller's reputation — and the likelihood that his investigation and its findings will be seen by the bulk of the country as non-partisan — is also what makes this such a huge gamble for the Trump administration.
  • On the one hand, the appointment of a special counsel gives Trump and his campaign a chance at real and full exoneration. "As I have stated many times, a thorough investigation will confirm what we already know — there was no collusion between my campaign and any foreign entity," Trump said in a statement. "I look forward to this matter concluding quickly."
  • As I've noted before, Trump's opposition to a special counsel — which the White House made clear via press secretary Sean Spicer as recently as Tuesday — never made sense to me. If you believe you are truly innocent and talk of collusion between your campaign and Russia is "fake news" created by the Democrats and the media, you should be wholly in favor of an independent investigation in order to validate that realty.
  • Trump will now get that chance.
  • On the other hand, should Mueller's findings implicate senior Trump campaign officials or even the President himself, it will be damn near impossible to discredit those facts. All Democrats will need to do to effectively rebut any attempt to question the findings is surface all of the nice things Republican elected officials have said about Mueller both tonight and in the past. That will make it very, very hard for Republicans to not swallow the medicine that Mueller is doling out.
  • Republicans — from Donald Trump on down — will now live or die by what Mueller finds out. Full exoneration is now possible. But so too is full guilt or blame. Republicans' political fate — in 2018 and perhaps 2020 as well — is now largely in Mueller's hands.
  • You only make this sort of gamble when you believe the full faith and confidence of the American people in their institutions is at stake. Rosenstein clearly believed that all the water already under the bridge on Trump and Russia forced his hand on that front — and so he acted.
  • Now Republicans wait with bated breath to see what Mueller produces.
https://apple.news/AuOy6yuZbQGCKeEunsGvDTg
 

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
Trump Calls Himself the Victim of a ‘Witch Hunt’
WASHINGTON — President Trump lashed out on Thursday, saying he was the target of an unprecedented witch hunt, a day after the Justice Department appointed a special counsel to investigate ties between his presidential campaign and Russian officials.
  • In a pair of early morning Twitter posts, Mr. Trump cited, without evidence, what he called the “illegal acts” committed by the administration of his predecessor, Barack Obama, and the campaign of his former opponent, Hillary Clinton — and said they never led to the appointment of a special counsel.
  • “With all of the illegal acts that took place in the Clinton campaign & Obama Administration, there was never a special councel appointed!” Mr. Trump wrote, misspelling counsel.
  • Moments later, Mr. Trump added, “This is the single greatest witch hunt of a politician in American history!”
  • The posts, shortly before 8 a.m., were a stark contrast to his muted reaction to the announcement on Wednesday evening that Robert S. Mueller III, a former F.B.I. director, had been named to investigate ties between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.
  • In a statement released by the White House, the president said: “As I have stated many times, a thorough investigation will confirm what we already know — there was no collusion between my campaign and any foreign entity. I look forward to this matter concluding quickly.”
  • How Mr. Trump should respond to the appointment was the subject of brief, but lively debate in the Oval Office, several senior officials said, with most of the president’s aides counseling a conciliatory tone. Mr. Trump often takes his most combative stances in early morning Twitter posts.
  • The president is correct in his observation about the rarity of a special counsel, though his references to the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration may not bolster his case. There were multiple congressional investigations of the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, and the role played by Mrs. Clinton, then the secretary of state, and Mr. Obama.
  • It is not the first time Mr. Trump has likened the questions about his campaign and Russia to a witch hunt. In January, while still president-elect, he said in an interview with The New York Times that the persistent focus on Russia’s hacking of the American presidential campaign was a witch hunt carried out by people bitter at his victory over Mrs. Clinton.
  • Mr. Trump’s sense of grievance over the Russia investigations had been deepening even before the naming of a special counsel. During a commencement address at the United States Coast Guard Academy on Wednesday, the president abruptly diverted from his uplifting theme to complain that “no politician in history” had been treated “more unfairly” than him.
  • “You will find that things are not always fair,” he told the graduates. “Look at the way I’ve been treated lately, especially by the media. No politician in history — and I say this with great surety — has been treated worse or more unfairly.”
https://apple.news/AgzGjr48GSRGEUqGgyT_FWQ
 

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
Who Is Robert Mueller? Special Counsel Hailed by Both Parties as Straight-Shooting Prosecutor
Republicans and Democrats alike praised Robert Mueller's appointment as special counsel — rare bipartisan support for someone so prominent.
  • Former FBI Director Robert Mueller, the special counsel appointed Wednesday to run the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign, is widely respected by both parties after more than 20 years at the forefront of U.S. law enforcement.
  • Mueller — who takes over a sprawling team of prosecutors and FBI agents working on the Russia investigation — ran the FBI for 12 years, taking over the agency just a week before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
  • A survivor of one of the more contentious periods in recent U.S. political history, Mueller, 72, commands rare bipartisan support for someone who has been so prominent in national affairs for so long.
  • Mueller is "a great selection," Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said on Twitter. The ranking Democrat on Chaffetz's committee, Elijah Cummings of Maryland, called Mueller's appointment "a solid choice" in a statement Wednesday night.
  • Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, one of the first Republicans to call for appointment of a special counsel, called Mueller "a fantastic person."
  • "I don't know him personally, but I think it's a good move," Kinzinger told reporters in Washington.
  • Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, a member of the Judiciary Committee, told MSNBC: "Bob Mueller has the experience and expertise, the guts and backbone, to ensure the independence of this investigation."
  • Even Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union — which sued the FBI numerous times during Mueller's tenure as director — said, "We applaud the selection of Robert Mueller," adding: "We are confident that he can and will carry out an independent investigation."
  • Trump didn't mention Mueller by name in a statement Wednesday night, which said: "As I have stated many times, a thorough investigation will confirm what we already know — there was no collusion between my campaign and any foreign entity. I look forward to this matter concluding quickly."
  • Mueller was appointed to head the FBI by Republican President George W. Bush and was asked to stay on by Democratic President Barack Obama in 2011. His 10-year term was extended by two years, and he finally retired in September 2013 — making him the second-longest-serving FBI director behind only its founder, J. Edgar Hoover.
  • Mueller came to the FBI job after having served as U.S. attorney in San Francisco. Two leading members of Congress from California, Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, both hailed his appointment as special counsel.
  • Feinstein called Mueller a "respected and talented" prosecutor, while Pelosi praised him as "a respected public servant of the highest integrity."
  • In what some may see as an ironic twist, Mueller takes over a case that is likely to significantly involve his successor as FBI director — James Comey, whom President Donald Trump fired last week.
  • Mueller was widely reported to have threatened to resign in the face of pressure from the Bush administration to endorse renewal of Bush's controversial warrantless wiretapping program in 2004.
  • Comey, then deputy attorney general, became nationally famous when he rushed to the hospital bed of then-Attorney General John Ashcroft to intercept White House envoys seeking to get a seriously ill Ashcroft to sign off on the program.
  • Mueller is the first special counsel to have been appointed for any reason since 2003, when Patrick Fitzgerald was named to investigate the leaking of a CIA operative's name.
Who Is Robert Mueller? Special Counsel Hailed by Both Parties as Straight-Shooting Prosecutor - NBC News
https://apple.news/AuLWhgHhESnqSmrjTo_-w8w
 
Last edited:

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
The Special Counsel Might Actually Be a Win for Trump. He Freaked Out on Twitter Anyway.
  • Donald Trump was reportedly blindsided last night by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. Rosenstein called White House Counsel Don McGahn right after signing the order naming former FBI director Robert Mueller to the role, and McGahn gave the shocking news to the boss.
  • As Politico tells us, the explosion one might have expected did not occur:
Trump handled it better than anyone expected, according to a person in the room. His reaction was “extremely measured,” another said.

Priebus and Trump together delivered a rally-the-troops message to the team: “This is an opportunity to let them do their work so we can do ours,” Priebus and Trump both reiterated multiple times to the aides gathered.

  • This second tweet is a return to the self-pitying tone Trump adopted at yesterday’s Coast Guard Academy commencement, when he whined: “No politician in history, and I say this with great surety, has been treated worse or more unfairly.”
  • And the first tweet suggests that it does not occur to Trump that his and other Republicans’ endless attacks on Obama and Hillary Clinton might look a bit witchy-hunty to more objective observers.
  • In any event, Trump advisers should be rushing to his side this morning to urge him not to publicly contradict his own privately calm reaction to the Mueller appointment. If, as Trump insists, he and his people have nothing to hide, then having a special prosecutor looking into it all poses no long-term threat to his presidency, and has a lot of short-term benefits. Rosenstein’s surprise move essentially acted as a circuit-breaker, stopping what was beginning to look like Watergate on fast-forward and offering a respite from an atmosphere of crisis and finger-pointing that left Trump’s GOP allies stumbling in the dark. If nothing else, Mueller’s appointment will slow everything down for months, giving an understaffed and overwhelmed administration time to act more strategically. There will be plenty of time to plot unpleasant things for Rosenstein down the road, when fewer people are watching.
  • It is also possible, of course, that Trump understands all this, and his angry tweets are simply chum in the water to keep his “base” agitated in his defense, and prepared to interpret future adverse events as an attempted coup by the media, its “deep state” accomplices, and assorted evil elites. But for the embattled, shell-shocked denizens of Trump’s White House, the president’s sunrise twitter storms are another reason it’s impossible to sleep easily.
The Special Counsel Might Actually Be a Win for Trump. He Freaked Out on Twitter Anyway. - New York Magazine
https://apple.news/AoJciEV9CTRqMsn1gs_Bucw
 

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
Poll: Voters back Russia special prosecutor
Voters are applauding the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election and any connections to Donald Trump’s campaign.
  • But, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, voters aren’t ready to begin the constitutional process of impeaching the president and removing him from office.
  • Nearly two-thirds of voters, 63 percent, either “strongly” or “somewhat” agree with the Justice Department’s decision to appoint former FBI Director Robert Mueller to oversee the Russia probe, the poll shows. Only 21 percent of voters disagree with the decision to appoint a special counsel.
  • The vast majority of Democratic voters, 80 percent, support the decision to appoint an outside prosecutor — but so do half of Republicans and 58 percent of independents.
  • On impeachment, 38 percent of voters want Congress to begin the process of removing Trump from office. A plurality, 46 percent, do not want impeachment proceedings against Trump. Sixteen percent of voters don’t know or have no opinion.
  • Most Democratic lawmakers have discounted the possibility that Congress will work actively to remove Trump, at least given the current state of the investigation. But Democratic voters are more eager to move forward, the poll shows: More than two-thirds, 68 percent, want Congress to begin impeachment proceedings now.
  • Comparatively, only 12 percent of GOP voters and 33 percent of independents want Congress to launch impeachment efforts.
  • "The Democratic base is not taking allegations against President Trump lightly," said Morning Consult Co-Founder and Chief Research Officer Kyle Dropp. "Sixty-eight percent of Democrats think Congress should begin impeachment hearings. Furthermore, 48 percent of Democrats think that investigating Trump and Russia should be the number one priority for Congress."
  • The poll, conducted last Thursday through Monday, comes after a string of negative press coverage for Trump — with much of it surrounding the Russia investigation and Trump’s firing of former FBI Director James Comey.
  • Voters are recoiling at some of these scandals, the poll shows. A 56-percent majority calls Trump sharing highly classified national security information with Russian government figures in the Oval Office “inappropriate,” while only 19 percent say Trump’s disclosure was “appropriate.”
  • Following Trump’s intelligence disclosure, voters have limited faith in his ability to “handle highly classified national security information,” according to the poll. Only 43 percent feel “very” or “somewhat” confident in Trump’s ability to handle classified information, while 51 percent say they are “not too confident” or “not confident at all.”
  • The poll also shows voters tilting against Trump firing Comey: 33 percent say his decision was appropriate, while 41 percent say it was inappropriate — roughly equal to a week ago.
  • Trump and his aides have provided different explanations for why the president dismissed Comey, but more voters believe he “wanted to hinder the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s alleged involvement in the 2016 presidential election” (47 percent) than think Trump “no longer believed … Comey was fit to lead the FBI” (34 percent).
  • "Our latest polling finds that Americans are not only divided in how to react to the latest news out of Washington, they're divided over what the news is," said Dropp. "For example, 76 percent of Democrats think President Trump fired FBI Director Comey to hinder the Russia investigation, while just 17% of Republicans agree."
  • The poll was conducted prior to Monday’s bombing of a pop music concert in England, but it does show voters divided sharply on Trump’s ability to “keep the country safe from terrorism.” Forty-eight percent say they are “very” or “somewhat” confident in Trump, but 47 percent are “not too confident” or “not confident at all.”
  • Views of Trump’s ability to keep Americans safe from terrorism fall along partisan lines. Eighty-five percent of Republicans are very or somewhat confident in Trump, but only 17 percent of Democratic voters are. Among independents, 44 percent are very or somewhat confident, and 49 percent are not too confident or not confident at all.
  • The poll does show a slight bump in Trump’s approval rating, which ticked up to 45 percent from 41 percent late last week. But half of voters still disapprove of the job Trump is doing as president.
  • The POLITICO/Morning Consult poll surveyed 1,938 registered voters and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.
Poll: Voters back Russia special prosecutor - POLITICO
https://apple.news/Ab6Db2YCeQDG2pYnSfj5hkg
 

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
James Comey in early talks with special counsel Mueller on Russia testimony, memos
WASHINGTON — The negotiations over James Comey's testimony have begun.
  • The former FBI director who was fired by President Trump has started preliminary discussions with special counsel Robert Mueller about his intention to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee about his communications with the president, as part of the panel’s ongoing inquiry into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, USA TODAY has learned.
  • A close associate of Comey who is not authorized to comment publicly said Tuesday that Mueller is not expected to block the former director from appearing before the Senate panel. However, that appearance would occur only after Comey is fully debriefed for the federal investigation, the source said.
  • The panel previously announced that Comey, abruptly dismissed earlier this month as he was running the FBI's Russia investigation, agreed to testify following the Memorial Day holiday. No date has been set.
  • But there were questions about whether the four congressional committees running concurrent investigations into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election would be able to secure public testimony and documents from Comey and other witnesses now that Mueller has been appointed.
  • Mueller, a former FBI director succeeded by Comey in 2013, was appointed to take over the FBI's wide-ranging Russia inquiry earlier this month after Comey's firing. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced Mueller's selection a day after it was disclosed that Comey maintained a secret file documenting his communications with the president.
  • Comey's notes include his account of his Feb. 14, encounter with Trump in which he says the president urged him to back off the examination of former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Flynn had been fired the day before for lying to other administration officials about his communications with Russia ambassador Sergey Kislyak before the inauguration.
  • Now, lawmakers want access to Comey and his memos, contributing to mounting tension between interests of lawmakers who are urging a public airing of Russia's interference — and Mueller, a prosecutor who might worry that any disclosure of potential evidence could damage an ongoing criminal investigation.
  • Public testimony could become even more important as the Russia controversies continue to dominate the news cycles in Washington — especially when it comes to determining Trump's motives when firing his FBI director four months into his term.
  • In the days after firing Comey, Trump called Russia investigation a "made-up story" and said in an interview with NBC News that it was indeed on his mind when he fired the FBI chief. That contradicted his administration's previous assertions — and even his own widely disseminated termination letter to Comey — stating the dismissal was based on the recommendations of Justice Department leadership, who objected to his handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
  • As special counsel, Mueller's investigative authority includes whether attempts were made to obstruct the federal inquiry.
  • The person familiar with Comey's contacts with Mueller said that while discussions between the two have only been preliminary, there appeared to be an understanding of the need for public testimony from Comey.
  • There also was agreement on the need for Mueller's team to be fully briefed before Comey provided public testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee.
  • Last week, Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the Republican chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which also has sought Comey's testimony, canceled a scheduled hearing, saying Comey needed to consult with Mueller before offering any public comment.
  • The discussions involving Comey and Mueller come as at least two of the four congressional committees investigating Russia interference appeared to ramp up their activities. Michael Cohen, Trump's outspoken personal lawyer, acknowledged Tuesday that he is resisting a request from congressional investigators seeking information from him about possible contacts with Russia.
  • Cohen's name surfaced last year in an unsubstantiated dossier prepared by a former British intelligence agent, alleging that the lawyer attended a meeting in Prague to discuss Russia's targeting of Democrats for hacking operations.
  • "To date, there has not been a single witness, document or piece of evidence linking me to this fake Russian conspiracy,'' Cohen said in a text message to USA TODAY. "This is not surprising to me because there is none! I declined the invitation (by the Senate and House Intelligence panels) to participate as the request was poorly phrased, overly broad and not capable of being answered.''
  • Cohen is the second Trump associate to refuse cooperation with congressional investigating committees. Earlier this month, Flynn rejected a subpoena from the Senate Intelligence Committee, asserting his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Last week, the committee issued two new subpoenas to Flynn's businesses and is seeking a response by early next week.
  • A third associate, Carter Page, an ex-foreign policy adviser to Donald Trump's campaign, told USA TODAY on Tuesday that he no longer plans to testify publicly before the House Intelligence Committee in June as part of the panel's investigation of Russian interference in last year's election. Page had announced just last week that he planned to testify, in part because he wanted to rebut statements made in a public hearing a week ago by former CIA Director John Brennan. The ex-CIA chief told the panel he had "unresolved questions" about whether Russia had been successful in getting Trump campaign officials to act on its behalf.
  • Asked whether he was prohibited from rebutting Brennan's testimony, Page replied in a text message, "That sounds like a credible theory."
  • Meanwhile, former Trump campaign adviser Boris Epshteyn, who served briefly in the White House press office, confirmed Tuesday through his attorney that he has received "a broad, preliminary request for information" from the House Intelligence Committee and has asked committee officials some questions to "better understand what information they are seeking" and whether he "is able to reasonably provide it."
  • Separately, White House spokesman Sean Spicer declined to address the uncertainty surrounding top Trump adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner.
  • Kushner, according to a person familiar with the FBI investigation, has drawn the scrutiny of federal investigators related to his contacts with Russian officials prior to the inauguration.
  • Spicer specifically refused to comment on disclosures that Kushner sought to establish a back-channel of communications with the Kremlin, which were first reported by The Washington Post. Kushner, according to the report, was open to using Russian communication facilities to open that line.
  • Also Tuesday, Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, formally requested that Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and National Security Agency Director Michael Rogers produce any personal notes of their communications with Trump in which the president may have urged them to publicly deny the existence of any evidence of possible collusion involving the campaign and Russia.
  • Last week, Coats declined to address any such encounter during testimony before a Senate panel.
  • Trump has also hired a personal lawyer to handle any matters related to the ongoing Russia investigations. Last week, former senator Joe Lieberman withdrew from consideration as the next FBI director, citing Trump's hiring of Marc Kasowitz to represent him in the Russia inquiry as a conflict of interest.
James Comey in early talks with special counsel Mueller on Russia testimony, memos - USA TODAY
https://apple.news/AqP0vqgwqRQSrGrB4MR4sFQ
 

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
Trump to decide whether to block Comey testimony: White House adviser
U.S. President Donald Trump will decide whether to invoke his presidential powers to block former FBI Director James Comey from giving congressional testimony next week, White House senior adviser Kellyanne Conway said on Friday.
  • Comey, fired by Trump last month, is due to testify on Thursday before the Senate Intelligence Committee in both an open session and behind closed doors. The hearings could add to problems facing the president over probes into alleged Russian meddling in last year's U.S. election and potential collusion by his campaign.
  • In an interview with ABC News, Conway appeared to indicate that the president would allow Comey to testify, saying, "We'll be watching with the rest of the world when Director Comey testifies."
  • But asked directly whether Trump would use executive privilege to prevent Comey from speaking with lawmakers, Conway added: "The president will make that decision."
  • Legal experts say Trump could invoke a doctrine called executive privilege to try to stop Comey from testifying. But such a maneuver would likely draw a backlash and could be challenged in court, they said.
  • Trump fired Comey on May 9, prompting a political firestorm and accusations by critics that he was improperly seeking to hinder an FBI probe into Russia's role in the election and potential collusion by Trump's campaign.
  • Comey is expected to be asked by the Senate panel about conversations in which the president is reported to have pressured him to drop a related FBI investigation into Trump's former national security adviser Michael Flynn, whose ties to Russia are under scrutiny.
  • The Justice Department and several U.S. congressional committees are investigating the Russia matter.
  • The Russian government has denied U.S. intelligence agencies' conclusion that it sought to influence the election in Trump's favor, but Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday that some Russian individuals may have acted on their own.
  • Trump, who has raised doubts about the U.S. agencies' findings, has denied any collusion.
Trump to decide whether to block Comey testimony: White House adviser - Reuters
https://apple.news/AVDfgXWGlSVW5psFIOixm3w
 

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
Trump being Trump, I just can't imagine that he won't block Comey from testifying... I mean, how could Trump do otherwise, given his impulsively indignant personality??

Legal scholars say that the courts are unlikely to uphold Trump's blocking of Comey's testimony, and Trump will simply give himself another political mess because of how such a blocking will make him look. Plus, Trump's own public discussion of his exchanges with Comey will likely neutralize the validity of any executive order to silence James Comey.

But since when does that stop Trump? He just likes the bluster, if nothing else. And even when he loses, he just blusters some more and pretends he won.

And his supporters just nod in agreement, "Yeah, thatz rat.... yeah, thatz rat..." before their Velveeta intake drops them to the dirt floor.

I just can't envision Trump not making that gaffe. What could possibly stop him?
 

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
Trump surrogates go after Mueller
Many in the president's circle praised the special counsel's appointment last month but have publicly turned against him in recent days.
  • Robert Mueller’s glow is fading.
  • The special counsel who earned bipartisan praise last month as an unimpeachable investigator who would give President Donald Trump a fair shake in the Russia probe is now taking heat from Trump surrogates intent on trying to undercut his integrity.
  • Hardball complaints are coming at Mueller from several directions. His impartiality is being questioned because one of his likely chief witnesses, the ousted FBI director James Comey, is a longtime friend. Others have flagged past campaign contributions from some of Mueller’s newly-appointed prosecutors to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. A few say the whole probe is a sham and that Mueller should be removed as special counsel.
  • The wave of freelance attacks, which gathered steam over the weekend following Comey’s dramatic testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, echoes tactics used by Democrats in the 1990s to undercut special prosecutor Kenneth Starr’s investigation into the Clinton White House.
  • “I think the idea of having an enemy when you’re the object of a special prosecutor is a very important one,” said Dick Morris, who helped pioneer the anti-Starr strategy as a Clinton adviser but is now a Trump fan.
  • “Clinton only survived a special prosecutor because he made Ken Starr the enemy,” Morris added.
  • The attacks on Mueller started taking shape last week. Sidney Powell, a former Justice Department attorney who has written extensively about overzealous prosecutors, wrote an op-ed questioning one of Mueller’s staffers on the conservative site Newsmax, which is run by Trump friend Chris Ruddy. Powell zeroed in on Andrew Weissmann, who led the prosecution of Enron executives in the early 2000. That task force, she wrote, “quickly devolved into a cabal that used mob tactics itself.”
  • Conservatives kept up their complaints on Monday. Writing in the Washington examiner, columnist Byron York suggested Mueller may not be the right person for the job because he’s been friends with Comey for 15 years.
  • “Is that a conflict? Should a prosecutor pursue a case in which the star witness is a close friend? And when the friend is not only a witness but also arguably a victim – of firing – by the target of the investigation? And when the prosecutor might also be called on to investigate some of his friend’s actions? The case would be difficult enough even without the complicating friendship,” York wrote.
  • The anti-Mueller pot also is being stirred on Twitter. Ann Coulter complained in a post that Attorney General Jeff Sessions “never should’ve recused himself” from the Russia investigation, adding: “Now that we know TRUMP IS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION, Sessions should take it back & fire Mueller.”
  • Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who in a Sunday interview on Fox News echoed the president’s complaints that the Mueller probe is a “witch hunt,” got a bit more specific on social media on Monday. He wrote: “Republicans are delusional if they think the special counsel is going to be fair. Look who he is hiring. Check fec reports. Time to rethink.”
  • It was a big reversal for the former House speaker, who wrote in a Twitter post on May 17, the day the Justice Department announced the special counsel appointment: “Robert Mueller is a superb choice. His reputation is impeccable for honesty and integrity. Media should now calm down.”
  • Other Trump associates in recent days have been circulating links to federal fundraising databases showing several of Mueller’s new hires have given to Democrats. They include Weissmann, who is on detail from his post as head of DOJ’s criminal fraud division, who donated $2,300 to Obama during the 2008 campaign; Mueller’s former law partner, James Quarles, who donated $4,600 to Obama for the 2008 and 2012 campaigns and $2,700 to Clinton in 2016 (FEC records show he’s also donated to prominent Republicans, including Sen. George Allen and Rep. Jason Chaffetz); Michael Dreeben, who gave $500 to Obama for the 2008 campaign, as well as $1,000 to Clinton in 2006; and Jeannie Rhee, a former DOJ attorney who donated $5,400 to Clinton in 2015 and 2016, as well as $4,800 to Obama in 2008 and 2011.
  • Rhee also represented the Clinton Foundation in 2015, where her partner was Democratic Washington powerhouse attorney Jamie Gorelick—who now represents Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump.
  • Morris, who now supports the Trump White House, called the special counsel’s hiring of past Democratic donors “a huge mistake on Mueller’s part.”
  • “He has to have a staff of virgins,” Morris said.
  • Trump and his associates haven’t shied away from aggressive tactics on other aspects of the Russia investigation. Last week, the president himself accused Comey of lying to Congress while under oath about conversations the two men had in the Oval Office and on the telephone regarding the 2016 campaign probe. The Trump White House had outsourced its initial attacks against Comey to prominent surrogates like the Republican National Committee, Trump personal attorney Marc Kasowitz, and the president’s oldest son, Donald Trump Jr.
  • The shift from targeting Comey to targeting Mueller became apparent this weekend, when one of the president’s personal attorneys, Jay Sekulow, in an appearance on ABC’s “This Week” refused to rule out whether the president would pledge not to fire the special counsel. Appearing on “Fox News Sunday”, RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel said that while Mueller’s probe will “run its course” she also hoped it would “end quickly.”
  • The White House did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for Kasowitz, Mark Corallo, declined to comment, as did Mueller’s spokesman Peter Carr.
  • Even though it was done during the Clinton era against Starr, Democrats are warning that slamming the investigator remains a risky approach.
  • “It’s a shameful, shameful ploy,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Monday on the Senate floor concerning the conservative attacks on Mueller. “The right must be afraid of what Mr. Mueller’s going to find.”
  • Added Adam Goldberg, a former special associate counsel in the Clinton White House, “Why would you want to bait them and attack them? It would be crazy and motivate them on the investigation side.”
  • A white-collar attorney who is in the middle of the Russia investigation said Trump surrogates don’t need to level attacks against Mueller, even if such an approach has often been favored in the past by the president’s New York-based personal attorney.
  • “Kasowitz loves this junkyard dog thing,” the attorney said. “My experience is that’s, more often than not, not a winning strategy.”
  • “There are circumstances where people behave in a way that’s sufficiently awful that you need to get out there and create a trench and really go for it,” the attorney added. “But those instances are rare and you need articulable facts that support it.”
  • Don Goldberg, who helped spearhead Clinton White House communications during the Monica Lewinsky scandal and congressional impeachment proceedings, said questioning Mueller over the staffers he’s appointed who donated to Democratic candidates “might be effective” for the Trump defense team. “It’s not an unreasonable narrative to start saying the team that has been put together is tainted,” he said.
  • But, he added, such a strategy could risk a backlash. “If you’re trying to affect the narrative, I think going after and attacking people of that stature who are not partisan people is really a mistake,” he said.
  • Several Republicans interviewed in recent days said they’re still struggling with where to land on attacking Mueller.
  • While Ruddy called the original special counsel appointment “flimsy stuff” without any legal basis, he said Trump would be asking for trouble if he heeded the calls from Coulter and others to fire the special counsel.
  • “It could trigger something well beyond anything they ever imagined. I think firing Mueller could trigger an impeachment process. It could be very dangerous. I don’t think it’d be very smart at all,” he said.
  • In an interview Monday, former Trump campaign adviser Sam Nunberg said he still welcomed Mueller as the leader of the Russia probe.
  • "Robert Mueller's record at the FBI is not problematic like James Comey's, in my opinion. I disagree with recent comments made by others going on a jihad against Mueller," Nunberg said.
  • For now, Morris said “Comey represents a better enemy than Mueller.” But he also suggested that Mueller will become a ripe target as the investigation unfolds, allowing Trump’s defenders to paint the investigation as an either-or proposition.
  • “The strength of the special prosecutor is he’s a man with his staff with one mission to go get one man,” Morris said. “The weakness is if he doesn’t get that man he goes out of business and everyone gets unemployed and they lost that opportunity for a place in the limelight. The public can easily see this as a zero-sum game between Trump and Mueller.”
Trump surrogates go after Mueller - POLITICO
https://apple.news/AGJfgoqr0TmGpuOmLDItbGQ
 
Last edited:

Snarky Oracle!

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
8
 
Awards
21
I still kinda wonder why Trump didn't attempt to block Comey from testifying. Bannon must have told him not to.

The rumor swirling now is that Trump is considering firing Mueller. Or is that just too much??
 

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
Friend Says Trump Is Considering Firing Mueller as Special Counsel
WASHINGTON — A longtime friend of President Trump said on Monday that Mr. Trump was considering whether to fire Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel investigating possible ties between the president’s campaign and Russian officials.
  • The startling assertion comes as some of Mr. Trump’s conservative allies, who initially praised Mr. Mueller’s selection as special counsel, have begun trying to attack his credibility.
  • The friend, Christopher Ruddy, the chief executive of Newsmax Media, who was at the White House on Monday, said on PBS’s “NewsHour” that Mr. Trump was “considering, perhaps, terminating the special counsel.”
  • “I think he’s weighing that option,” Mr. Ruddy said.
  • His comments appeared to take the White House by surprise.
  • “Mr. Ruddy never spoke to the president regarding this issue,” Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, said in a statement hours later. “With respect to this subject, only the president or his attorneys are authorized to comment.”
  • Allies of the president cast doubt on the idea that Mr. Trump would take such a drastic step, and White House officials said Mr. Ruddy had not met directly with the president while he was there.
  • Firing Mr. Mueller would be a politically explosive move that would raise new questions about Mr. Trump, whose abrupt dismissal of James B. Comey as F.B.I. director generated accusations of obstruction of justice and led to Mr. Mueller’s appointment.
  • Mr. Trump has been known, in moments of frustration and stress, to vent threats of action to members of his inner circle. In the past, some of those private expressions of anger have been made public by friends and associates, only to generate speculation about moves that never take place — including a senior staff shake-up that has yet to happen.
  • Such moments sometimes reflect the deep division among Mr. Trump’s White House advisers about the best course for the president to take in the face of political or legal adversity.
  • Under Justice Department rules, Mr. Trump would seemingly have to order Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein to rescind department regulations protecting a special counsel from being fired for no good reason, and then to fire Mr. Mueller. If Mr. Rosenstein refused, Mr. Trump could fire him, too — a series of events that would recall the “Saturday Night Massacre” during Watergate, when President Richard M. Nixon sought to dismiss a special prosecutor, Archibald Cox.
  • White House officials referred questions to Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer, Marc E. Kasowitz, as they have recently on all matters relating to the Russia investigation. A spokesman for Mr. Kasowitz declined to comment.
  • The former House speaker Newt Gingrich, a longtime supporter of Mr. Trump’s, said in a tweet on Monday that it was time to “rethink” Mr. Mueller’s ability to be fair.
  • “Republicans are delusional if they think the special counsel is going to be fair,” Mr. Gingrich tweeted after praising Mr. Mueller’s integrity in recent weeks. Apparently referring to Federal Election Commission reports, he added: “Look who he is hiring. check fec reports. Time to rethink.”
  • The idea that the investigation is illegitimate and politically motivated has been gaining currency on the political right for months. Conservative writers, radio hosts and cable personalities — emboldened by the president himself, who has called it a witch hunt — have repeatedly sought to discredit the inquiry, its investigators, the mainstream news accounts of it, and the lawmakers on Capitol Hill who are demanding more answers.
  • Initially, Mr. Comey was the subject of much of their derision. Now they have moved on to Mr. Mueller, whom they are attacking as too compromised and conflicted to lead an independent inquiry.
  • In the PBS interview, Mr. Ruddy said Mr. Trump had considered replacing Mr. Comey with Mr. Mueller, who served as F.B.I. director during the George W. Bush and Obama administrations. A senior White House official confirmed that the president had interviewed Mr. Mueller for the F.B.I. post in the Oval Office the day before Mr. Rosenstein tapped him to be the special counsel in the Russia investigation.
  • Mr. Ruddy said the president was weighing whether to dismiss Mr. Mueller because of concerns about conflicts of interest. He said those concerns included the interview for the F.B.I. post and connections between Mr. Mueller’s law firm and White House officials.
  • “There are some real conflicts. He comes from a law firm that represents members of the Trump family,” Mr. Ruddy said. “I know for a fact that he was under consideration and that the president did talk with him in the days before he was named special counsel. I think there’s a conflict there.”
  • He also said that he believed it would be “a very significant mistake” for Mr. Trump to fire Mr. Mueller, but emphasized that he was concerned about what he described as conflicts.
  • The criticism of Mr. Mueller has intensified in recent days, spreading from Trump surrogates like Mr. Gingrich to powerful media personalities like Rush Limbaugh. On his radio program last week, Mr. Limbaugh endorsed the suggestion that Mr. Trump fire Mr. Mueller.
  • Mark Levin, another prominent radio host, has also called for Mr. Mueller’s firing. “Mueller must step aside,” he wrote on Facebook over the weekend.
  • Much of the criticism has focused on whether Mr. Mueller is too close to Mr. Comey. The two became friends after working closely together during the Bush administration.
  • Democrats accused Republicans on Monday of beginning a campaign to smear Mr. Mueller’s reputation as he engages in a broad investigation that could include whether Mr. Trump obstructed justice by pressuring Mr. Comey to end parts of the inquiry and then by firing him.
  • Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, the senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, scoffed at the idea that the president might fire Mr. Mueller.
  • “If President fired Bob Mueller, Congress would immediately re-establish independent counsel and appoint Bob Mueller,” Mr. Schiff said in a tweet. “Don’t waste our time.”
  • The independent counsel statute, passed after Watergate, allowed the appointment of a prosecutor who would look into high-level executive branch wrongdoing and answer to a panel of judges, and who could not be fired by the president, as Mr. Nixon sought to do.
  • Both Republicans and Democrats came to dislike the statute, which they saw as permitting prosecutors to run amok in the Iran-contra and Whitewater investigations during the Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton administrations. Congress let it lapse when it expired in 1999.
  • It would take a two-thirds supermajority in both chambers of Congress to overcome Mr. Trump’s likely veto of any similar legislation. It is far from clear that Mr. Schiff’s proposal could command such support.
Friend Says Trump Is Considering Firing Mueller as Special Counsel - The New York Times
https://apple.news/A1ofec78fTKmnnaFEq-VYmw
 

SueEllenRules!

Banned
LV
0
 
Robert Mueller will meet with Senate Judiciary Committee to coordinate on Trump-Russia investigation
Special prosecutor Robert Mueller will hold talks this week with senior Senate Judiciary Committee members to ensure that there is no conflict between his investigation of potential collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign and the panel's probe, two congressional aides said on Monday.
  • Mueller, a former FBI director, will meet on Wednesday with the committee's Republican chairman, Charles Grassley, and its top Democrat, Dianne Feinstein, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
  • They will be joined by Republican Lindsey Graham and Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse, the chairman and ranking member of the Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism, they added. The subcommittee is examining what U.S. intelligence agencies say was a Russian campaign of influence was intended to boost Donald Trump's chances of winning the 2016 presidential election.
  • The discussions will focus on ensuring that the subcommittee's investigation is not interfering with Mueller's probe, one source said.
  • Spokesmen for the committee and for Mueller declined to comment.
  • Mueller also was expected to meet sometime during the week with top members of the House of Representatives' Intelligence Committee for a similar discussion.
  • A spokesman and a spokeswoman for the panel also declined to discuss the matter.
  • The special prosecutor met last week with the Republican chairman and the top Democrat overseeing the Senate Intelligence Committee's investigation of what U.S. intelligence agencies say.
  • Russia denies that it conducted such a campaign, and Trump denies there was any collusion between his campaign and Moscow.
Robert Mueller will meet with Senate Judiciary Committee to coordinate on Trump-Russia investigation - Business Insider
https://apple.news/AysDlsjb7T5SNVgvBTjUZ-g
 
Last edited:
Top