That's not a perfectly valid question?
Some men may never vote for a woman under any circumstance, but it's certainly not representative of all men. Look at Sarah Palin in 2008. Republicans were more excited to vote for her than John McCain.
It would be one thing if you were expected to vote for a candidate because she's a woman. It's another thing entirely when you're being asked to vote for a candidate despite the fact that she's a woman.
Gender is not an issue for me, and for President Obama to assume men who don't support Hillary are sexist misses the mark. There are women that don't support her either, so does that say anything about them?
Many men aren't intimidated by women in general. However, when it comes to a highly intelligent, highly capable, highly accomplished woman like Hillary Clinton, that's a horse of an entirely different color. [cue McGarrett or another of his sexist pals to disparage Hillary Clinton by comparing her to a horse]
I don't have a problem with Hillary's intelligence, nor her years in politics. However, I do have an issue with her record on gay rights, criminal justice reform, welfare reform, foreign policy, pay to play scandals, using a private email server for government business, giving paid speeches to the banks, accepting money from countries that violate human rights, and so on.
Also, Jill Stein is a Harvard educated physician, so I clearly have nothing against intelligent, capable women.
Oh, dear God. Seriously?
Hence the word "almost." lol
I certainly don't want to see a Trump presidency, but I do like the aspect of it blowing up in the establishment's face. After all, Trump is their creation.
