What was the last film you watched?

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
The Professor and the Madman (2019)
About the compilation of the first Oxford Dictionary, an interesting film on a number of levels: the determination of Mel Gibson's "professor", the kinship he finds with Sean Penn's "madman" (actually suffering from schizophrenia before such a thing was recognised). and of course the progress of the dictionary itself.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
BRAZIL (1985)

1726920417771.png

This has been my most-wanted film for quite a while even though it's all there on "that other website we often visit".
I tried to watch it then but found the spoken dialogue impossible to follow. It didn't help to adjust the volume because that also increased the loudness of the score and every other sound effect.
For some reason the DVD was kinda difficult to find but a few days ago I found a brand new copy for only 8 euros.
It's an Italian import but the image on amazon guaranteed English audio and subtitles. I was a little surprised to find out that it also has French and Dutch subtitles - which means that it isn't an Italian release but an Italian made European release.
Well, anyway, the subtitles made it possible to find the perfect compromise regarding dialogue vs. score and now I've finally watched the whole thing.

It's really great in every aspect, a bonafide masterpiece if you like, but the feeling I had was sort of like The Eurythmics in Willy WonkaLand. There's none of that synthpop music in it but at the same time there's something distinctively nostalgic eighties about it.
I usually find it difficult to buy into dystopian scenarios because it suggests that the worst thing has already happened, dramatically speaking it has nowhere to go.
But Brazil does it from a 1940s point of view and the result is brilliantly convoluted and hilarious. Even if nothing happened then it would still be a very entertaining film.
Bob Hoskins plays an heating engineer villain and Robert De Niro plays an heating engineer superhero. You'll never see that in any other film.
I think Jonathan Pryce was born to play this role and it must have been a challenge to always be "in the moment" in such a non-stop energetic production.

It is perhaps the most perfect title for a film that doesn't actually happen in Brazil, and the variations on the Brazil theme are beautifully done. The only version I knew was the disco remake by the Ritchie Family.

 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
BARBIE (2023)

1726924280191.png

I decided to ignore BARBIE while it was still in the midst of its hype, so last night I watched it for the first time.

After the introduction or BarbieLand (I'm a sucker for life-size toy/cartoon worlds but the pink overload made me feel a little nauseous) the story starts with the impending crisis courtesy of the person playing with Barbie. This part reminded me of the perfect sitcom world of Pleasantville gettin upset by the real world teenagers.
Once Barbie and Ken arrive in the real world it becomes a mix of parody and homage, and the trick is to find the right balance so that nothing has to be sacrificed.
It's not as good as Galaxy Quest but I thought it was getting pretty close.

Then at some point the real world mother starts a passionate speech about the hardship of being a woman (as if being man doesn't come with any expectations at all) and this really took me out of the fantasy. It felt like a bad moment of telling rather than showing.
But then suddenly it struck me that everything she said doesn't make sense in the context of role reversed BarbieLand.
In fact it is Ken (the film's temporary antagonist) whose story arc is told from a female oppressed point of view, and this should immediately take the sting out of any alleged wokeness.
And while it may be dressed up as a liberation of women from the real world's point of view, BarbieLand itself strongly advocates and even battles for the idea that is "in fact" perfectly alright to aim for pretty airheadedness and fantasies about super careers that don't mean a thing. But from a child's point of view it doesn't have to mean anything and it's really only about acting out fantasies.
I think this is why both the film and Mattel are massively getting away with it. The critique simply makes way for the reinforcement of Barbie.

It's got tons of gags and even if I didn't laugh at everything then at least there wasn't anything in it that annoyed me. I had no idea Will Ferrell could be so funny.
There's also no holding back when it comes to the Ken jokes, and I just loved all of it. And he also got the songs.

So when all that great stuff has happened I guess they didn't want to compromise its ending by giving Barbie and Ken a happily ever after.
Barbie going into the real world "Little Mermaid" style could also be interpreted as Barbie leaving the film and return to the shelves of the toy stores where all toys belong until they're being chosen by someone who wants to play with them.

I'm not sure if we needed a Barbie film, and the fact that they managed to produce a great Barbie film makes it even more special imo.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
SAINT MAUD (2019)

1726925797793.png

From my chronological viewing experience this is "Part III" in the Religious Young Woman In Big Trouble Trilogy (First Omen, Immaculate).
A part of this film has the familiar vibe of a person being too interested in another person, but all things considered I think it marches to the beat of its own drum.
It's possible to see a little bit of TAXI DRIVER in it - either way, it's the winner in this unofficial trilogy.


GOODFELLAS (1990)

1726927282804.png

I have no idea why it's taken me so long to watch this critically acclaimed and universally loved masterpiece. It's not as if I had tried to avoid it so I guess I just forgot all about it.
I don't know what other people saw in this film, but to me it looked like a buch of totally uncharismatic, horrible characters doing horrible things. And something about loyalty.
And there's a narrator to guide me through the whole banal experience, perhaps it was meant to give this film a Woody Allen-style wholesomeness? Whatever it was it didn't work for me at all.
Even as a biopic it doesn't have any merits. Henry Hill who ?
Bah!
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
CUL-DE-SAC (1966)

1726961271542.png

When I think of Polanski classics such as Repulsion and Rosemary's Baby then I get the idea that it looked the way it was meant to be, and the casting of Catherine Deneuve and Mia Farrow makes perfect sense.
Cul-De-Sac has much more of a one hit wonder feel to it, and I mean that it's more difficult to imagine that someone wanted to do it such-and-so way with this-and-that actors.
It's almost as if they were already there, not connected, a sightseeing chance meeting, and Polanski simply had the foresight to see the pieces of the puzzle. And then, somehow, convinced them to go along with it.

There are moments of traditional comedy sketch but it gets a bit muffled by the tone and setting of the story. It looks like the focus is on characters being funny and eccentric rather than situational comedy. There's never a build-up to anything, all the great stuff happens out of the blue. Well, seemingly.
For such an oddball film (but not too oddball by 1960s standards) I find it surprisingly quotable.
In the second part of the film the George/Teresa/Richard trio is visited by friends of George, and since they don't know how to explain the presence of Richard he acts like the gardener who is sort of/sort of not the butler.
It's really funny to see how Teresa behaves like she's having the upper hand even though that's not the case at all.
I always love bad kids in movies, Cul-De-Sac has Horace, his mother's "little treasure", who seems ripe for the Willy Wonka treatment.

The cosey and isolated location also gives the film a strong holiday vibe and it's just one of several reasons that makes this film very rewatchable.
Jacqueline Bisset is in it too, apparently, but she's hiding behind big dark glasses. How very "Jackie" of her.
Françoise Dorléac as the laissez-faire young wife of eccentric Donald Pleasance (with somewhat artistic ambitions) makes me think of women like Anita Pallenberg and especially Amanda Lear who was living with Salvador Dali at that time.
But then again, it was the 1960s...and perhaps this film is a quintessential example of it. Starring Lionel Stander! It still doesn't make much sense but if this is the result then I'm not complaining.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
The French Connection v Get Carter

Did a 1971 crime double bill as both films were about to fall off the iPlayer. I've seen them both before but not for years and years. The French Connection is as exciting but difficult to follow (I blame myself) as I remember, while Get Carter is even more gloriously grubby and fantastically nasty than I was expecting.

Well, you planted the seed for me to watch Get Carter while it was still on iPlayer. And it was my first time.

I can see why these two films were grouped together since they both have that disorientating thing where stuff is going on but the viewer needs to resort to empirical evidence to work out what the actual story is. In fact iPlayer even tried to force me to auto-watch The French Connection immediately afterwards.

Lots of good stuff here: the locations look good (I especially loved the shot of the two hearses pulling away from the back of the house, down that steep lane overlooking industrial Newcastle); the score is a classic, and the only part of the film with which I was familiar before watching; there are some familiar faces (including Alf Roberts himself) and that Sunbeam Alpine is (or was) gorgeous.



The scenes involving club singers neatly illustrate the contrasting vibe of each film.

Oh - the video cuts off at the funniest part: the knicker-flashing catfight between the singer and the jealous wife while all the blokes watch in amused, world-weary approval.







But then again, it was the 1960s...and perhaps this film is a quintessential example of it. Starring Lionel Stander! It still doesn't make much sense but if this is the result then I'm not complaining.

You summed it up with the word "oddball", I think. It's hard to describe why I found the weirdness enjoyable. I had this to say about it when I watched it for the first (and probably only) time:

From the write-up I was expecting a precursor to Knots's Moments Of Truth. A home invasion film set in a suburban American cul-de-sac.

What I got was a film shot entirely on Lindisfarne by Roman Polanski and starring Dr Loomis from Halloween; Max from Hart To Hart (a villainous role here, but he did say "moider" at one point, making me grin from ear-to-ear); a French Michelle Pfeiffer lookalike; a then-practically-unknown Jacqueline Bissett; and that gobby Scottish piece who gave Kenneth Cope a spanking in Carry On At Your Convenience. All most surreal.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire (2024)
By this stage in a franchise you pretty much know what to expect and this film is no exception. But it's still fun to watch the 'Busters go through their paces and I think they've done a fair job integrating the new young cast with the obligatory appearances by the oldies - plus a dose of teen angst.
What I'd like to see next is a crossover with the 2016 characters in a mega-mutiversal cataclysm. They've already established the idea of other dimensions, but given the negative reaction to that film, I don't think we'll be seeing them again anytime soon.
 

Monzo

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
1
 
Awards
9
I watched Swan Song and actually only because of Linda Evans. I waited and waited and then finally in the last quarter of an hour of the film she was there. That alone made the film worth watching. Otherwise there were good moments and I would have liked lead actor Udo Kier to have received more recognition for his performance, not necessarily an Oscar nomination because the film wasn't strong enough for that. But his performance was definitely good enough for a Golden Globe nomination.
 

Payton Cross

Telly Talk TV Fanatic
LV
8
 
Awards
18
Beautiful Thing (1996)

iu


Another bit of future Top Ten research that's been on my viewing bucket list for many years.

What did I know about this ahead of time? Well, very little, as it turns out. I knew it was a gay coming-of-age film. I knew it features the music of Mama Cass, of course (I owned the soundtrack on CD many years ago and it was heavily-played. The CD was later cleared out, but most songs remain in iTunes. All the same, I spontaneously re-ordered the CD immediately after watching). And I read (perhaps in the CD leaflet) the intriguing titbit that the film features an "ingenious use of peppermint foot lotion", which sounded rather kinky. And that was where all my knowledge ended.

I had it in my head that this was set in Liverpool. Perhaps I was subliminally aware that writer Jonathan Harvey is from Liverpool. Or perhaps, between Brookside, Priest, Hillsborough, etc., I just have that city on the brain. But nope, it's set in Thamesmead, South East London (on some of the same locations as A Clockwork Orange). The actors whose faces were known to me mostly had EastEnders in common, and it does indeed feel like it has that gritty British soap thing going on (among lots of other things).

From posters and the very premise, it's apparent the two lead characters are young, and I wasn't sure how I'd feel about it watching for the first time as a cynical middle aged viewer. Happily, this film perfectly captured the world of the teenager, from its rules, threats and insecurities to its freedom, magic and fun, and it helped that it was made and set at a time where some of my own experiences aligned with those of the characters (Jamie even has the same Home and Away annual I had, which raised him even further in my estimation). The performances of the two lead actors is unforgettable. Like all the characters in the film, the place and time in which they live informs how they behave. Most characters behave in ways that are hard, unpleasant or anti-social, but just underneath it all there's a fragility and tenderness. I imagine it's not easy to write and perform in a way that's both truthful and accessible, but this story nails it (I'd thought the film was later adapted into a stage show but actually it's the other way round and the stage version came first).

Linda Henry (Enders' hard-faced Shirley. And before that, Mandy Salter's hard-faced mum) is the hard-faced mum here. She's one of several important supporting characters who made me feel I had their number on first sight, but went on to surprise me with their complexities and vulnerability. The other key example of this was her boyfriend Tony who I was convinced was a wrong 'un but turned out to be anything but.

Tameka Empson was a knockout as the Cass-loving neighbour. As I watched, I found myself seeing similarities with early Sixties Barbara Windsor. A special call out goes to Jeillo Edwards, playing Tameka's mother, who kept stealing the show with every little look. There's also Olive from On The Buses who alternates between scowling at her neighbours, caterwauling renditions of Big Spender during karaoke night at the social club where Sandra works and parading on the balcony outside the flat with swimsuit, bling jewellery and cocktails, nibbling cheese and pineapple on sticks. Meera Syal also did wonders with a very small role, with two lines in particular making me laugh out loud. Her cry of "Balls, Mr Bennett!" is the most easily-remembered line from the film.

On this subject, the dialogue is brilliant. I'm sure it's highly quotable, which is a reason to watch again and again. There's a nice selection of them here, but really almost every line is golden and some also very nostalgic. Like Sandra ordering Jamie to get crying Ste a tissue by saying "there's a box of autumnal shades by me bed". And there's lots of prosaic greatness, like the discussion about Sally from Coronation Street also being called Sally in real life, or everyday put-downs that mix pop culture references ("when you can keep up with the questions on Bob's Full House, you get back to me"). But there's also a lot of deeper stuff that reaches the heart. Some of it's like poetry. Some like rap. Frequently it's both. Even the dialogue is lyrical and makes this feel like a borderline musical.

Then there's the soundtrack. You could say this film is to Cass Elliot what Muriel's Wedding is to ABBA. I've long enjoyed the music of Cass and The Mamas & The Papas, but this film has done something incredible by creating new associations and deepening that love. Before watching I'd hoped this might happen, but I didn't count on the degree to which it would do this. There are a few tracks that will now give me chills thinking about the related scene in this film.

What I love about the choice of music is that it's plays against the sometimes bleak realism seen throughout. It's like the voice of hope, but also a joyful expression of youthful energy and optimism. The whole film feels like a mass of contradictory things, which is why the "urban fairytale" tagline fits so well. Characters are rude and foul-mouthed.... and all the more hilarious with it. They're aggressive or even violent, and somehow that creates more sympathy for them because it's clear they want to be more but don't know how. This makes the moments of vulnerability hit harder, especially when it's an unexpectedly sweet line.

And (spoiler) the film lives up to its name. It takes the ordinary and makes it beautiful. It's gorgeously shot and looks like art come to life, from the grey, brutalist landscape surrounding them (which, seen through the prism of this film feels inviting and warm and larger than life) to the twilight dance through the woods which in this romantic haze look very much like the backdrop to a Disney film.

I suppose in the most literal sense the titular beautiful thing is love or connection or truth. Or all the above. That "sweet contentment deep inside" which Cass sings about over the opening titles in It's Getting Better. And it delivers. Dancing happily between stark reality and sweet fantasy, the film lives its message.

With this film, it's difficult to decide if it was everything I would have wanted and more. Or if it was not at all what I might have expected while still speaking to me in a most unexpected way. But I came away from the film feeling both surprised and satisfied. And a whole lot more besides.

Something that almost never happens: I actually found myself rewatching this in full again today, which is the highest form of praise I can lavish on any film.


And an almost-bang-up-to-date review of the film:
Great movie ,i haven't seen this movie in years.
 

Payton Cross

Telly Talk TV Fanatic
LV
8
 
Awards
18
BARBIE (2023)

View attachment 54443

I decided to ignore BARBIE while it was still in the midst of its hype, so last night I watched it for the first time.

After the introduction or BarbieLand (I'm a sucker for life-size toy/cartoon worlds but the pink overload made me feel a little nauseous) the story starts with the impending crisis courtesy of the person playing with Barbie. This part reminded me of the perfect sitcom world of Pleasantville gettin upset by the real world teenagers.
Once Barbie and Ken arrive in the real world it becomes a mix of parody and homage, and the trick is to find the right balance so that nothing has to be sacrificed.
It's not as good as Galaxy Quest but I thought it was getting pretty close.

Then at some point the real world mother starts a passionate speech about the hardship of being a woman (as if being man doesn't come with any expectations at all) and this really took me out of the fantasy. It felt like a bad moment of telling rather than showing.
But then suddenly it struck me that everything she said doesn't make sense in the context of role reversed BarbieLand.
In fact it is Ken (the film's temporary antagonist) whose story arc is told from a female oppressed point of view, and this should immediately take the sting out of any alleged wokeness.
And while it may be dressed up as a liberation of women from the real world's point of view, BarbieLand itself strongly advocates and even battles for the idea that is "in fact" perfectly alright to aim for pretty airheadedness and fantasies about super careers that don't mean a thing. But from a child's point of view it doesn't have to mean anything and it's really only about acting out fantasies.
I think this is why both the film and Mattel are massively getting away with it. The critique simply makes way for the reinforcement of Barbie.

It's got tons of gags and even if I didn't laugh at everything then at least there wasn't anything in it that annoyed me. I had no idea Will Ferrell could be so funny.
There's also no holding back when it comes to the Ken jokes, and I just loved all of it. And he also got the songs.

So when all that great stuff has happened I guess they didn't want to compromise its ending by giving Barbie and Ken a happily ever after.
Barbie going into the real world "Little Mermaid" style could also be interpreted as Barbie leaving the film and return to the shelves of the toy stores where all toys belong until they're being chosen by someone who wants to play with them.

I'm not sure if we needed a Barbie film, and the fact that they managed to produce a great Barbie film makes it even more special imo.
I haven't seen the movie Barbie yet because after all the trailers and scenes I had an idea of how the movie would turn out, but maybe I'll give this movie a chance someday, because when I think of Barbie I quickly think of all the Barbie dolls I knew from my childhood and it's funny that some Barbie clothes from that time also appeared in the movie, So if I'm ever in a corny mood I'll definitely give it a chance. ;)
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (2003)
Sort of a Victorian-age Justice League.
A group of heroes from 19th century literature band together to try to prevent a war. Not as much fun as the premise implies.
 

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Awards
17
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (2003)
Sort of a Victorian-age Justice League.
A group of heroes from 19th century literature band together to try to prevent a war. Not as much fun as the premise implies.
I just remember it being somewhat of a big letdown given all the hype it received at the time. I didn’t find the story all that interesting.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
My Salinger Year (2020)
Reminiscent of The Devil Wears Prada. Sigourney Weaver as the imperious head of a literary agency overseeing a bubbly new employee and their reclusive client J.D. Salinger of Catcher in the Rye fame
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Threads (1984)

iu


It's easy to understand why this film has been invisible to me. Despite garnering no less than four BAFTAs (it was nominated for seven) it's only been shown on television a handful of times, one of which was the night before last to mark its fortieth anniversary. I stumbled across it on iPlayer last night.

As it got underway I could see it being a somewhat nostalgic look back at a vision of a calamity through the prism of Eighties Britain. This was reinforced by the opening act, which presented as a modest kitchen sink drama about a young Sheffield couple's unplanned pregnancy and the ensuing uncomfortable introductions between their parents. Like our soaps, it's a story about "us": just regular people dealing with life's daily challenges. Which sells the reality of what follows.

Tonally, the film evolves into echoing those scary public information films of the era in which kids were abducted, electrocuted for playing near live wires or sliced in half by trains. The premise here gives scope for this matter-of-fact everyday horror to be taken to extremes. And it is.

Even though I had an idea about the premise of the film I just wasn't ready for what came next. There is no preparing for this. Words that came to mind as I watched included: grim; powerful; bleak; shocking; horrifying... Some of the imagery is truly disturbing and gets into the soul and the psyche. But what makes it most disturbing is how real and feasible it feels. Sadly, as much today as forty years ago.

I'll say no more, because this piece is not just a film... it's an experience that needs to be undertaken, beginning to end.

There are very few films that truly haunt me. This, I feel quite sure, will be one of them.

I'll sign off with the original 1984 introduction to the piece, from a time when television presenters still spoke properly and authoritatively:
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
from a time when television presenters still spoke properly and authoritatively
From a time we still had the television presenters. I don't think the Dutch presenters spoke authoritative but they were always very polite and pleasant.
Here's Hans, informing us about the next episode of Dallas. Donna Culver makes a cameo appearance with some incomprehensible message.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
1408 (2007)

iu


Last night I was in the mood for something a bit creepy and atmospheric, but not too bloody. I fancied something a bit glossy and slick which meant Nineties or Noughties Dimension fare, but I didn't want anything too formulaically slasher-ish. Running a quick search for horror/thrillers of the era, 1408 came up in a couple of lists with favourable comments about the style (it's #26 in Rotten Tomatoes' 100 best films of the Noughties).

It's a Stephen King adaption and I suppose it does follow a lot of his formula (frustrated writer; creepy, off-limits hotel room; blood on the walls, etc., etc). All the same, it's a story with which I wasn't familiar and which held my interest.

There are a few cheeky jump scares, and some out there horror as well. As is so often the case with Stephen King type stuff, though, it's the lower-key elements that were most effective for me. I especially enjoyed creepy little touches upon entering the titular room, and a few subtle "did I just see that?" gaslighting moments. Possibly the most effective one in the entire film (involving, of all things, a toilet roll!) was also the simplest one, and drew a reflexive little "oh" from my mouth.

It helps that it's well-cast. Samuel L. Jackson is always good value for money. I'm sure I must have seen John Cusack in other films, but I struggle to place them. I was impressed with his screen presence and his overall performance. Being in practically every scene, with a lot of emotional highs and lows and frequently monologuing the entire film hinges on his performance, and he carries it with flair. I'd go so far as to say his performance would be the key reason for a rewatch and I'd certainly be up for checking out more of his work.

A nice surprise for a film of this genre was to see Gabriel Yared's name appear on screen as composer. As expected, he did a wonderful job, and the music fits perfectly. Since I think it would also stand up to out-of-context listens, I may well invest in the soundtrack.


In pictures, John Cusack often resembles Edward Norton to me. In this film, though, I found myself deciding that if Kevin Spacey and Ryan Reynolds had a baby, he'd probably look just like JC. It's reassuring to know that I'm not the only one whose mind went along this track:
^ Oh -the embarrassment. And she's boasting about being a film student.


​




I don't think the Dutch presenters spoke authoritative but they were always very polite and pleasant.
Here's Hans, informing us about the next episode of Dallas.

Oh, Hans looks very charming and smooth, and very smartly dressed. I like the way the borderline flamboyance of the rust-coloured jacket is balanced by the conservative striped tie. Of course, it's the taupe jumper that pulls everything together perfectly and makes him seem very accessible.

His flawless skin, glossy hair and dapper style are like something AI would put together today for young women (and young men) to swoon over.




Donna Culver makes a cameo appearance with some incomprehensible message.

Oh my. I was going to ask how well she spoke Dutch, but perhaps "incomprehensible" answers my question. Still, at least she had a go.

Did any other soap stars of the era attempt to wrap their tongues round the language?
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
GET CARTER (1971)

1728823839739.png

Because it's trending on tellytalk, and I needed to know how the catfight played out.
As with most plot-driven stories that deal with a lot of characters all of equal importance I sometimes struggled to remember the who-is-who. It may be very typical of gangster movies.
It's obvious that we're not in Hollywood anymore and the tone is very different from that other classic British crime drama The Long Good Friday (both titles often come up in the same conversation, hence the comparison).
Both films are made in the 1970s but whereas Friday looks ahead of its time in terms of mood and presentation, Get Carter often looks distinctively late 1960s.
Except, perhaps, for the entertainingly bourgeois scene at the Brumby place.
They're walking all over my furniture!

I honestly don't know if this film was more brutal than the ones that came before, but it certainly feels like an exploitation movie. A very good one.
Britt Ekland shows up for a little boobs show and that would have been enough for attention-grabbing purposes, but the real sizzle happens on the other end of the telephone line as we witness another character being exposed to a vocal description of that very scene.
The bad Bond girl, however, is played by Geraldine Moffat, unknown to me although there was something familiar about her. Maybe it was just the hair. Could be Jacqueline Bisset.

"Not in Hollywood anymore" is an understatement when you look at the grey and depressing surroundings with its early-modern high-rise that seemed like such a very good idea. (spoiler: it wasn't, but people have to live somewhere).
But there is atmosphere in everything and when I look at the bigger picture I would describe is "industrial medieval". Stone and mud and bridges.
Michael Cane's bad-ass character is uncompromising throughout the entire film. There's no redemption of justification, and what may have happened to Carter's brother never feels like a tragedy, that part belongs to the Carter's niece.
It doesn't feel like any of the revenge stories like Death Wish, but that's a bad film anyway. Very very very bad. But now that I mentioned it I see the connection of sexual abuse being at the core of the drama.
Get Carter has a terrific ending with some nasty surprises for everyone, it's almost like an end-of-season cliffhanger.

1408 (2007)
I rewatched it a few months ago and liked it better than the first time (expectations may have something to do with it). But I've already forgotten many details so it's back on the rewatch-list.
Oh -the embarrassment. And she's boasting about being a film student.
Ha ha. And that's why I should never interview a celebrity because everything in my head is a potpourri of correct and misremembered information.
Staying with the Cusacks, I keep thinking that Arlington Road starred Joan Allen and John Cusack, but in reality it's Tim Robbins and Joan Cusack.
The last time I watched it I noticed that I couldn't stand Jeff Bridges' voice and why do I even mention this?
His flawless skin, glossy hair and dapper style are like something AI would put together today
That is such modern thinking of you. The comparison would never occur to me but perhaps that has something to do with my personal and lonesome vigilante vendetta against A.I. (cue harmonica music).
Did any other soap stars of the era attempt to wrap their tongues round the language?
I don't remember any specific examples but sometimes they did when they guest-starred in quiz/grande variété shows that ruled Dutch TV in the 1980s.
Everyone now and then I watch some of it on youtube but it all looks very much like time-filler and it's not much fun to go through it again, in the same way that reality shows have no rewatch value whatsoever (imho).
 

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
2
 
Awards
9
SALEM'S LOT (2024)

Filmed in 2021 and shelved since 2022, the movie should have stayed there. I didn't think it would be possible to make a bad version of this story; there's so much source material to work with. The novel is Stephen King's best and there have been two above average TV adaptations. The movie is abysmal, although I only watched half of it.

Although set in the 1970s, the film completely abandons the PEYTON PLACE vibe. Presumably the filmmakers think modern audiences are too impatient for things like atmosphere, character development or specificity of location. The vampire is seen within minutes. One of the 1970s version's most iconic, creepy scenes was replaced with a cheap, silly jump scare followed by gore. And then I turned it off.
 
Top