What was the last film you watched?

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
I was merely intrigued by the story itself, but somehow they made it look like fiction.

THE REMAINS OF THE DAY (1993)

1722031913751.png

I have no idea how it compares to HOWARDS END (what? no apostrophe?) but I plan to find out.
REMAINS has all the hallmarks of a beautiful Merchant Ivory production, and while I understand that "frustration" and the clash between duty and feelings are central to the story, I found the experience of watching the film a little bit frustrating. And for more than one reason.
The role played by Anthony Hopkins is the epitome of tradition and mild-mannerism, and it goes without saying that he plays it wonderfully.
But with emotions suppressed to the extreme there's no opportunity to create a character that can be loved or hated or admired or appreciated - or any feeling that would qualify when watching films - and I don't know if the end was supposed to be a comeuppance or something else....or nothing at all.
Not that I expected big melodrama in style of Downton Abbey, but when it comes to the poignancy of missed opportunities I think 84 CHARING CROSS ROAD was much more loveable and effective. Even if the reasons for that missed opportunity were quite ordinary compared to REMAINS.

Secondly, there's a very juicy and ominous story playing in the background, starring James Fox, no less.
With the supposedly well-meaning Nazis as the proverbial fox in the henhouse, and James Fox' gullible reaction to that, there's a weirdly strange connection between Lord Darlington and James Fox' Tony in THE SERVANT.
I've seen many stories about WWII but it's never looked so sneaky and menacing and Hitchcockian as it does in REMAINS.
So, yeah, more of that and less of the anxious Darlington servants would have been very nice.
Oh...oh, and thirdly, we never get to see the wife of the new owner played by Christopher Reeve. What if she's a fabulous bitch who would make a TV series sequel necessary? Talk about missed opportunities.
 

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Awards
17
My Cousin Vinny (1992)

This one admittedly never gets old for me. Joe Pesci and Marisa Tomei were great together. It’s always worth seeing just for the laughs alone.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
WITHNAIL & I (1987)

1722109693166.png

Here, hare. Here.
I've had a strange day today. Awake for an hour, then going back to bed for two hours - and this repeated itself until I decided at 7 o'clock in the evening that enough was enough. It was time to do something.
No idea why I picked this one, it was one of the first titles that popped up on Prime and perhaps I made the nonsensical and totally useless connection with Clifford T. Ward's "Wherewithall".
The first scenes in the flat of the two unemployed and disillusioned actors look pretty disgusting, and since I was already feeling weird I wondered if it was a bad decision to watch this film today.
But the witty script and frightfully enthusiastic performances by the ten-years-away-from-the-Tardis Paul McGann and Richard Grant as his sociopath friend informed me that I needed to watch it.
Basically, they're playing characters who would love to be in a film like this.

I find it more entertaining than laugh-out-loud funny, although I did make me laugh uncontrollably a few times, and I loved the story's bittersweet ending.
Overall, I think it looks like a grislier version of Absolutely Fabulous. But it needs to be re-watched at least once.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Black Water: Abyss (2020)

iu


Thinking I was being clever, I delayed delivery of my Personal Services DVD until yesterday so I could dive into it last night. But, of course, Amazon deliver up to 10pm, and this didn't arrive until well into the evening, by which time I'd decided to save it for another evening and watch a different film instead.

On a whim this sequel became last night's film. I was aware of it, but had pushed it to the back of my mind, fearing it wouldn't live up to the first Black Water film, which is up there as one of the best examples of its kind.

I did feel a little hope on seeing Andrew Traucki's name as director, since he'd also directed the original, as well as The Reef (AKA the-best-killer-shark-film-that-isn't-Jaws). Likewise, Michael Robertson was a producer here as on the earlier two projects.

The good news is that (with admittedly low expectations) this was a much better film than anticipated. All the same, many of its strengths come with a flip side.

The film does create a sense of claustrophobic doom with its setting and the situations (swimming through dark, flooded, labyrinthine tunnels with no idea if there is even air to be found at the other end is my idea of hell). But most of the action taking place in underwater caverns means this is a very dark-looking film, losing much of the beautiful scenery and making it difficult to even see what's happening

As with Black Water and The Reef, we have a small ensemble of characters who are tied through friendships and romance (this one lacks the familial layer from in the earlier films). Both those films had a bit of romantic tension, but that element is taken to the Nth degree here, to the point of feeling indulgent and inappropriate in these circumstances. Who was it, I wonder who thought a story where characters faced the choice between drowning or being eaten alive could be improved by introducing an emerging love quadrangle and resultant pregnancy drama.

Another element that comes across as I watch these films is that the women as resourceful survivors is pushed a little hard, while the men are either gung-ho or in need of protection. It's not hugely problematic, but I wouldn't object to a change to this formula. The fact that we first meet this film's heroine scrolling through her boyfriend's phone without his knowledge or consent (and lying to him when he asks for her help finding said phone) speaks volumes.

It's difficult to say much about the ending without spoilers, but suffice to say I preferred the one it seemed we had before the one we actually got was tacked on.

Still, the bottom line is that this is a croc-attack film so it's probably best enjoyed on its own merit without overthinking. On that basis it certainly works. There were a few jump scares that got me and some chilling moments. The croc scenes were well-done and nicely restrained, and no tacky CGI was to be found anywhere. And it's probably just forgettable enough that it would comfortably stand up to a second viewing in a few years' time.​
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
D.A.R.Y.L. (1985)

1722200623072.png

Sort of a more dramatic version of Disney's THE COMPUTER WORE TENNIS SHOES (1969) and it doesn't always play out like a typical kids movie, maybe that's one of the reasons why it failed to impress.
Even though it looks like a decent production there are also parts in it that makes it look like made-for-TV.
in this case I appreciate the bells and whistles-lite approach because it allowed me to ponder the problems and possibilities of robots, clones or any kind of AI life form getting integrated with human life.
To be fair, the story does cheat a little bit by making D.A.R.Y.L. as human as possible, which makes it much easier to love him.
The various action scenes are sufficiently exciting, some of it over-the-top but not totally unbelievable in the context of the fantastical story.
What I certainly did not expect was a jump scare that made me fall out of my chair.

All in all, I found it very wholesome and entertaining and it's got a lovely soundtrack by Marvin Hamlish.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
Top Poster Of Month
LV
9
 
Awards
20
Miracle on 34th Street (1959)
With Christmas falling in the summer in the southern hemisphere, the concept of "Christmas in July" has become quite popular here in recent years because it allows the enjoyment of traditional Christmas (read "winter") fare such as roast turkey and pudding in a more pleasant environment.
In keeping with this sentiment, I thought I watch this alternative version of Miracle, made for television in 1959.
Ed Wynn stars as Kris, with some of his Uncle Albert mannerisms, but he's also somewhat underrated as a dramatic actor (see The Diary of Anne Frank made the same year) so does well in the more serious moments as well.
The story has been extensively rewritten to fit a one-hour timeslot. Paradoxically, this includes a number of additional scenes to make more explicit themes that develop more slowly in the original. Less forgivable is the shoehorning in of jokes which give it the feel of a fifties sitcom. I kept waiting for the laughtrack to kick in. But at least they kept the scene between the post office employees rather than make it the idea of one of the participants as they do in the other remakes I've seen, thus removing the whole concept of the miracle.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Personal Services (1987)

iu


A disclaimer at the beginning and the end of the film goes to great lengths to let the viewer know that while the author was inspired by the story of Cynthia "House Of Cyn" Payne, this isn't her biography. I assume this was either to prevent legal action or an outcome of the same.

It's one of several films that came out of the Eighties Top Ten round and while I'm clearly too late to throw this one in there, it's still good to have good reason to finally watch it. I can see why it passed me by the first time, since I was still at school and quite naïve (not that this had stopped me enjoying stuff like the Confessions films and the film Julie Walters made before this one, 1986 sex comedy Car Trouble).

I've not read or watched the Fifty Shades series (though I'm consistently told that the films are rather twee considering their reputation), but I can't imagine there's much there that wasn't covered in Personal Services. Two key considerations with this film, though, are that it's as tasteful as can be in the circumstances, and it has tongue firmly in cheek.

Despite its subject matter and all the inherent sex references coming from that, this is ultimately a film that shows sex work as prosaic and and almost dreary, while showing sex workers as possessing grace, humour and bundles of humanity.

Julie Walters' accessibility helps greatly. I loved her getting the giggles and making awkward conversation when her first client arrived, before gagging when she realised he wanted oral sex (as did all her clients at first since she'd copied the phrase "French Polishing" for her advertisement, not realising exactly what it meant). Her reactions to the role playing, too, kept it human. Giggling at the sight of Shirley Stelfox punishing a middle aged man dressed as a schoolboy, or showing visible boredom when pretending to be a lesbian schoolgirl. The comedy is very real and her timing spot-on. There are so many little looks that are timed to perfection, such as the sharp head turn she does as Shirley briefly leaves the room during a session (evidently afraid that she's being left to finish the job on her own). The moment that made me laugh the hardest was where she finds a tiny pair of fur-lined panties lying round and picks them up to inspect them as though she's handling an explosive, face grimaced in borderline confusion. She puts her hand inside and the very second it emerges from front (revealing them to be crotchless) the door buzzer goes sharply and she jolts. It's a silly, almost throwaway moment, but it's pure Julie Walters.

But it's in the balance between this life and her personal one where she shines. This is especially evident in scenes with her father, and the ups and downs of her relationship with him are what makes this film. Arguably the film's strongest dramatic moment comes in their confrontation in the park on the day of her sister's wedding, where ugly truths are spoken, almost to the point of catharsis.

Terry Jones's direction helps set the tone. He (understandably) shows far more restraint than he did in the Python films, but there's an undercurrent of the requisite quirk.

The already-mentioned Shirley Stelfox is one of the best things here, gamely throwing herself into each new scenario with great vigour. She dominates as if to the manner born, she jets off to please a sheik, then she returns and goes to the greasy spoon where she orders a steak, sparks up a fag and has a giggle over the various sizes and shapes of her clients' bits. And on top of this she pays her rent on time. I'm currently watching 1986 Brookside where her character - mousy Madge - hasn't been seen for some time. Presumably because Shirley was filming this. The two are worlds apart, and I can imagine what great fun she had switching hats and getting stuck into this Shirley.

Their clients include Yes, Minister's Sir Frank Gordon, Blakey from On The Buses and Ever Decreasing Circles' Howard. And the cast is filled with very faces very familiar to anyone who knows the British entertainment world. There are thespians and character actors alike, most of them as you've never seen them elsewhere.

This is a film that knows what it's about, and it's really about poking fun at British sensibilities (and hypocrisies) when it comes to sex. It dusts off what goes on behind closed doors, gives it a good airing and doesn't apologise for it. Rather like Christine/Cynthia herself.

(Needless to say, low-key spoilers and mild sex references within):
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
THE LAST OF SHEILA (1973)

1722290454825.png

When discussing classic whodunits it's usually about the Agatha Christie adaptations, but this film is written by Stephen Sondheim and Anthony Perkins (!) and it's a fantastic mystery that keeps evolving.
I had no idea where and how it would end, the only indication was the remaining play time (which, come to think of it, is kinda spoiler-y).
Like the other, more familiar theatrical releases, SHEILA is gloriously convoluted and contrived, but that doesn't change the fact that someone has to cook it up first.
Holy Norman Bates, Batman!

It's definitely the most vibrant whodunit I've ever seen. The actors have a great script to work with and it shows. I could almost believe that half of it was played ad lib (especially Dyan Cannon) but of course that wouldn't work with such a complex mystery.
Raquel Welch smoulders like a gorgeous European Bond girl but according to wiki there was a big problem between her and the director (and also James Mason, who despised her work attitude).

The characters have to play a game, courtesy of movie tycoon Clinton Greene played by James Coburn, and I found this part a little confusing.
Something about the proof of the sin and who has the card - but all that stuff makes more sense when the real detective work begins.
I got it on DVD, well that's what I thought because it's one of those made-on-demand DVD-Rs by the Warner Archive (*grumbles*).
But the disc plays fine and the picture quality is great so I'm going to keep it.
Great stuff!
 

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Awards
17
TWISTERS (2024)

I was majorly disappointed with this one. It just felt like it never got going. It’s not often I see a movie and can’t find something positive but I’m afraid this is one of those times. I didn’t have high expectations going in so I figured it couldn’t be that bad but, well, apparently that didn’t help matters.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
KILLER JOE (2011)

1722638729781.png

This is FARGO minus the fun and with a SOPRANOS style ending. Gina Gershon is great as the slutty stepmother and the film is always entertaining enough...but nothing special.


RESTORATION (1995)

1722639230874.png

And now I understand why I've never heard of this film, not here, not on youtube or anywhere else on the internet.
It's a gorgeous production and Polly Walker looks absolutely stunning but apart from that the film is painfully devoid of the oomph that this story requires.
The best thing I can say is that it's perfectly inoffensive except for Melanie Griffith's Nicole Kidman's Meg Ryan's hair (ironically, in a story about big bewiggery).
Robert Downey looks wide-eyedly adorable but has no idea if the role should be played dramatically or farcically. Perhaps the director was too distracted by all the splash on the display.
Apparently the film itself has not been restored (yet?), it's shown in standard definition which only adds to the overall bland experience.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
TOOTSIE (1982)

1722721841065.png

A fan favourite in the 1980s movie top ten and of course it's impossible not to know it.
It's got a little bit of "Nine To Five" in it, perhaps also some Cagney & Lacey vibes but maybe that's just the droning piano music that was so popular at that time (e.g. Cheers).
I usually avoid the men-in-drag comedies because I find it so predictable and cliché especially when there's lust and romance involved, which is also very much the case in this film.
Thankfully it never becomes hysterical, and perhaps it is the commitment of actress Dorothy Michaels to her fans that spills over into the reality of the film itself.
It's not dismissed as "it was all a joke" and there's no desire to counterbalance it with macho behaviour just to make sure that everybody understands how straight Dustin Hoffman is.
This makes it much easier to believe in it, but most importantly Dorothy doesn't do funny, she is funny in lots of little things. And charming and pleasant and in fact the kind of character I'd love to watch in a soap.
As the strong-willed TV character catapulted into superstardom it also foreshadowes the success of Joan Collins in Dynasty, I think.

I think Tootsie has a consistently entertaining and intelligent script and this overcomes the weaker part of the story when Michael deals with the other female characters as a man.
Teri Garr isn't very convincing as the doormat friend and I don't know why she was still there after Michael had taken her acting job.
During the montage scenes of Dorothy-in-the-magazines they played the song "sweet Tootsie roll" and suddenly I realised that I had no idea who Tootsie was.
There was Emily Kimberly played by Dorothy Michaels played by Michael Dorsey played by Dustin Hoffman.
So I wondered, what if tootsie is not a name but a noun? I paused the film to look it up and there it was.
But I still don't understand where the word comes from in the context of the story, let alone why it became the title of the film.

My favourite scene happens in the dressing room with the almost naked actress and then Michael/Dorothy sort of sings "dum deedee deedum" as if to say I'm not impressed and totally minding my own business. It's only three seconds but it made me laugh out loud.
 

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
2
 
Awards
9
So I wondered, what if tootsie is not a name but a noun? I paused the film to look it up and there it was.
But I still don't understand where the word comes from in the context of the story, let alone why it became the title of the film.

It's a line of dialogue in the film.

Ron Carlisle: Take ten, Tootsie.
Dorothy Michaels: Ron? I have a name, it's Dorothy. It's not Tootsie or Toots or Sweetie or Honey or Doll.
Ron Carlisle: Oh, Christ.
Dorothy Michaels: No, just Dorothy. Alan's always Alan, Tom's always Tom and John's always John. I have a name too. It's Dorothy, capital D-O-R-O-T-H-Y. Dorothy.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
It's a line of dialogue in the film.
Yes, but that happens after the montage/song scene, and therefore after the "tootsie" theme had already been established.
Had it been (casually/jokingly) mentioned at the beginning, and then somehow the word became catchy then it would make more sense that the rest of the story would build on it.

The way it happens in the film kinda looks as if everyone is aware of the soundtrack.
 

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Awards
17
But I still don't understand where the word comes from in the context of the story, let alone why it became the title of the film.

The stories that have come down over the years are that “Tootsie” was a pet name Dustin’s mother gave him when he was a child or it was the name of the family dog. I don’t know if either of these are true but the original title of the film was slated to be “Would I Lie To You?” Maybe they just felt “Tootsie” was catchier and the inside joke of one of those two scenarios I mentioned appealed to them, I don’t know.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
Thank @DallasFanForever , the way you describe the situation kinda justifies that I feel a little mystified by the film's title.
Looking at the theatrical film poster (assuming I picked the original one) there is something misleading about the way it's worded.
"He's Tootsie" as opposed to "a tootsie".
But maybe it's just because I wasn't familiar with the word. Julie Christie was "Darling" in 1965 but that doesn't look strange to me.

I didn't mean to blow it out of proportion and it doesn't affect my appreciation for the film, but this is a discussion forum and we should be allowed to ask questions (even if that question has nothing to do with Dallas' fake season).
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
Top Poster Of Month
LV
9
 
Awards
20
The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes (2023)
Despite my bias against prequels, I thought I'd give this one a go since I watched the original four-film trilogy not long ago.
It's not too bad, possibly more exciting than the last two. The key is that the inevitable transition of the main character from hero to villain is accompanied by the introduction of a new protagonist whose fate is unknown and remains so at the end leaving room for Stars Wars-like sequels-to-the prequel.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Priest (1994)

iu


In the coming months I hope to watch a number of Jimmy McGovern-penned films. This was the logical starting point since it's the earliest of his readily-available feature-length works. And by "readily-available", I mean I had to track down a DVD imported from the Netherlands since that's the only way this piece can be watched uncut (there is also a heavily-edited American DVD release, based on the bastardised version shown there which evidently still upset many people... for all the wrong reasons).

Being aware of the film's premise and knowing Jimmy Mac's writing (primarily from Brookside, where he's delivered some of its strongest material), I fully expected a film that had a lot to say without pulling its punches. On both counts I was right. What did surprise me (even though on reflection it shouldn't) was just how even-handed the film was in its own opinions. For each point of view expressed there is an opposing one. We see the best and worst of the church, and we see humanity at its ugliest and its most beautiful. And all of it feels honest so I felt no real sense of agenda, even though it's obvious where Jimmy Mac's rebellious heart ultimately lies. The criticisms might seem irreverent (or blasphemous, as knee-jerk, one-note reviews for the American market suggest), but they're also respectful, balanced and well-researched.

As the titular character, Linus Roache embodies the film's duality perfectly. He has a face of hope and innocence but behind those sad, angelic eyes he smoulders with a combination of anger at the injustice and hypocrisies with which he is daily faced and inner conflict over his torn loyalties and passions. Every once in a while he'll explode and let it out, raging at the powers that be, at himself, or at the naked figure of Christ. As the son of Corrie's Ken Barlow, Linus had a particularly challenging mountain to climb, but - while I did find myself occasionally reflecting how much he sounds like his father - any novelty factor was overcome extremely quickly by the performance delivered which is incredible by any standards. The angst, the turmoil of emotions and the backdrop of Catholicism (always good for theatrics and drama) allows the performance to go bigger at times, but never jarringly so. I found myself wondering why he doesn't seem to have had a high profile career after this performance... then I looked at his profile and apparently he has, but I missed it.

There's also a terrific supporting cast of actors, a combination of well-known names and wonderful character actors. Tom Wilkinson is brilliant in this, with his character's showmanship towards his flock providing a nice contrast with the younger, more earnest priest. Their strained relationship and their challenging of each others' fixed beliefs is engrossing. We think we have him pinned at the start, but he's actually the film's most rational and compassionate component... as key to the film's message as anyone.

This was an early film for Robert Carlyle and shows he was bold and willing to invest in his characters right from the start. Paul Barber and Lesley Sharp complete the "soon-to-be-Full-Monty" quartet (there may be more, for all I know).

A year before playing a sex worker in Band Of Gold, Cathy Tyson is Maria: the housekeeper who will only tolerate so much judgement before she speaks out and lays the truth on the line. Following this moment, there's a terrifically brief exchange between the Father and Maria where an understanding is reached with minimal dialogue. It's one of the most efficient scenes I've ever seen.

With the Liverpool setting and this writer, it's perhaps unsurprising that there are some familiar faces late of Brookside. Robert Pugh plays another messed-up, ill-motived antagonistic role. Here, as there, this isn't really about him but about the conflict his actions create for those around him. Here, as there, he convinces some but not others, is met with reason, compassion, furious anger and threats, and ultimately exits suddenly before the resonance really takes effect. Brookie's Teresa can be seen as a melancholy mourner at a wake, looking as though she has the burdens of the world on her shoulders... just as she did when I watched her final Brookside episodes a matter of weeks ago (implicitly referenced in an episode I watched after the film, in which Damon rode on the ferry and tried to impress a potential girlfriend with his wordiness by telling her he knew someone who'd killed herself by throwing herself from such a ferry). There's also Harry Cross as the world's oldest altar boy whose annoyance towards the actions condemned by others could be viewed as coming less from any moral religious ground and more from the fact that it means a loss of status for him.

Other familiar Liverpudlian faces included Aveline from Bread as a close relative of the departed at the wake ("I hated the bastard" she confesses to the father, before receiving forgiveness in a beautifully shot scene with the light from the gathering inside casting a heavenly halo onto her hair from behind). A face I recognised but couldn't place turned out to be Tony Booth, who I most recently watched in Till Death Us Do Part. Given his famously outspoken political views, his presence in Priest makes perfect sense (and it's funny to think that three years after this, his real-life son-in-law would become British Prime Minister). Young Christine Tremarco gives a beautiful and soulful performance here, too. This is a film that is cast with care and perfection.

Another pleasant-surprise-that-really-shouldn't-have-been-surprising-to-me was the presence of Jimmy's wry, earthy humour. There's a vein of it that runs through the entire film and it's very welcome. Little touches that flesh things out and add interest. Much of it is to be found in witty lines: like the priests witnessing a woman in furious argument with her departing partner, repeatedly calling him "gobshite". At the end, one asks who the woman is, and the other replies "Mrs Gobshite, presumably". Some of it is almost surreal: like the old housekeeper who serves up the meat for dinner wearing a "MEAT IS MURDER" apron and a face like a smacked arse; or the two men who invite the door-knocking priests into their home to talk before revealing they're Jehovah's Witnesses. Other times it's laugh out loud funny: such as the two priests drunkenly feigning loud sex noises to piss off another priest in the next room. The wit is not just restricted to English either. There's a scene where the Father makes an evidently offensive suggestion to a superior in Latin. The humour is one of several reasons why this film - despite some dark subject matter - didn't feel overly heavy (much less offensive, though I can see how some would find it so).

The final revelation for me was just how unexpectedly moving I found the film. I found myself tearful at times without truly being able to pinpoint exactly why. Then it pulled the emotional rug out from under me at the end and, again, it took me by surprise. I don't consider myself an easy target when it comes to writing toying with my emotions. This usually triggers irritation rather than tears. I think the reason this one got me was because it felt honestly reached. As I said, the writing was very truthful and matched by the performances. This goes a long way. I still don't know if my tears were of joy, sadness or something else... and I like that it's ill-defined and messy.

Ultimately, this isn't a film about any of the things that stoked whatever controversy it garnered. It's about love, hope and acceptance.

Anyway, it's a month too late for the Nineties Top Ten... but this one would comfortably have been in my Top Three.​
 

Angela Channing

Telly Talk Veteran
LV
19
 
Awards
52
Miracle on 34th Street (1959)
With Christmas falling in the summer in the southern hemisphere, the concept of "Christmas in July" has become quite popular here in recent years because it allows the enjoyment of traditional Christmas (read "winter") fare such as roast turkey and pudding in a more pleasant environment.
In keeping with this sentiment, I thought I watch this alternative version of Miracle, made for television in 1959.
Ed Wynn stars as Kris, with some of his Uncle Albert mannerisms, but he's also somewhat underrated as a dramatic actor (see The Diary of Anne Frank made the same year) so does well in the more serious moments as well.
The story has been extensively rewritten to fit a one-hour timeslot. Paradoxically, this includes a number of additional scenes to make more explicit themes that develop more slowly in the original. Less forgivable is the shoehorning in of jokes which give it the feel of a fifties sitcom. I kept waiting for the laughtrack to kick in. But at least they kept the scene between the post office employees rather than make it the idea of one of the participants as they do in the other remakes I've seen, thus removing the whole concept of the miracle.
I didn't know this version of the film existed. I've seen the superb original 1947 version, the awful 1973 remake and the decent 1994 version so now I have to track down a copy of this film so I can complete the set, although your description of it doesn't make it sound overly promising.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
Priest (1994)
Thank you so very much. As I was thinking of LGBTQ films (our first movie top 10 theme after we've finished the 2010s decade) I remembered this film and how much I liked it - but, frustratingly, I couldn't remember the title (you wouldn't expect it to be as to-the-point as "Priest").
I'd have to watch it again in order to rate and rank it....let's hope Mother Internet is going to helpful.
 
Top