Brookside Brookside

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
I especially liked that I agreed with pretty much everything he said.

Same here.



However, he's admirably even-handed in his approach. Despite his reservations about the Jordache storyline, I appreciated him pointing out some of the nuances in the family dynamic.

Yes, it's very balanced. I thought the same when he gave Mal Young a break by pointing out that Phil Redmond was still around to have his say on the series at that point.





It might be worth reading alongside Ricky Tomlinson's, in which he takes Redmond to task over a few things.

Thanks. I'll have to look out for Ricky's book.





The TVTimes did something equally questionable eight years later when it had Enders' equivalent wife-beating rapistTrevor posing on its cover like so, blurring the lines between the reality of domestic violence which the soaps purported to depict and funtime panto villainy

Oh yikes.






I'll probably return to the beginning once Sheila and Billy head off to Basingstoke,.

This is something I want to ask you about as someone who knows the series far better than me: do you know if there's a specific episode around that time that's good to check out on or that gives a good sense of closure? Do you choose their actual final episode or is there any benefit to watching any beyond that?

I'm about 30 episodes away from Billy and Sheila's departure, which probably translates to six weeks or so.
 

James from London

International Treasure
LV
6
 
Awards
18
This is something I want to ask you about as someone who knows the series far better than me: do you know if there's a specific episode around that time that's good to check out on or that gives a good sense of closure? Do you choose their actual final episode or is there any benefit to watching any beyond that?
Billy and Sheila's departure is pretty underwhelming and sadly, there's not much point sticking around after that (at least, there wasn't for me). Without their family contexts, Rod and Barry quickly become kind of bland and generic. Tracy still feels like Tracy, but is given very little to do. I don't think she even gets a proper exit in the end. It's just all a bit depressing really.
 

Carrie Fairchild

Telly Talk Star
LV
3
 
Awards
7
Incidentally, I'd forgotten about the coarser language in early episodes. Here was me thinking Debbie dropped the Brookieverse's first "shit" in Damon & Debbie. How could I forget about Gizzmo?
After a few false starts, I recently restarted a rewatch and I’m slowly working my way through episodes (I’m only up around February 1983 now). Not for lack of desire to watch them, more down to a lack of time. Anyway, the language is still quite coarse at this point. In a recent episode, Lucy Collins tells her boyfriend about having her “tits grabbed” at Brookside Comp, while Gizzmo laments the lack of “wipe your hole roll” at a girl’s flat where they were bunking off from school and tells the lads that he “had to use a piece of the Daily Mirror”.

The video also reminded me that I still haven't properly read Phil Redmond's book (even though I know from dipping in that some facts seem somewhat faulty when it comes to details).
I’ve probably mentioned it on here before but I’ve had that book for years and still haven’t finished it. I need to pick it up again and just jump to the TV bits because I felt that the chapters about Redmond’s early life were way longer and overly detailed than they needed to be.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Billy and Sheila's departure is pretty underwhelming and sadly, there's not much point sticking around after that

Thanks. I'll keep expectations low. Clearly I've forgotten it all which probably speaks for itself.

I had wondered about stopping on for another month or two, perhaps to see Jonathan exit at the end of October, or even until the end of the year (an option made even less attractive now I've noticed that Diana Spence arrives in late-1990). I have a feeling whichever route I go is going to be anti-climactic.




Without their family contexts, Rod and Barry quickly become kind of bland and generic. Tracy still feels like Tracy, but is given very little to do.

That's pretty much as my recollection goes.

Speaking of Rod, I've just watched five months' worth of episodes (Feb-July 1990) and he didn't appear once. I'm curious to know what was going on for Jason Hope during this time.


Incidentally, I've had a bit of a Ghost Of Brookside Future in my other viewing. I'm currently watching A Bit Of A Do which is so much better than I'd anticipated (I was expecting a sitcom, but I've got a relatively sophisticated comedy-drama which is quite sudsy in its storyline). For the best part of a week I've been trying to place the actress who plays Carol Fordingbridge, the blonde young woman who had a one-night stand with David Thewlis's character on the night of his baby's birth, and who I've just seen come third in The Crowning Of Miss Frozen Chicken UK.

I knew she was familiar and was fairly sure it was from a soap (my best guess was that she had some connection with The Firm in 'Enders). Anyway, just minutes ago when I was looking at 1991 character debuts on the Brookside wiki, to convince myself I wasn't going to be missing anything, there was that familiar name Karen Drury, and I realised it's the actress who played Susannah Farnham.







After a few false starts, I recently restarted a rewatch and I’m slowly working my way through episodes (I’m only up around February 1983 now).

I have rewatch envy now. 1983 feels like a dim and distant (but very happy) memory to me at this point. Enjoy.




Anyway, the language is still quite coarse at this point.

Interesting. I'd imagine the episodes would have aired and the initial reaction to the series would have been known to execs by this point, so presumably there was no panic to remove it all straight away, even if it was perhaps toned down. The Soap Study video mentioned that the ratings declined drastically within months, with the language the most off-putting factor for viewers, so I'd guess it will peter out to a more conservative level as 1983 goes on.




I need to pick it up again and just jump to the TV bits because I felt that the chapters about Redmond’s early life were way longer and overly detailed than they needed to be.

I suppose the balance is tricky with this kind of book, which is essentially both an autobiography and a behind-the-scenes look at the making of several series.

So far I've only ever used it as a kind of encyclopaedia, looking up certain Brookside character names or events in the index to see what Phil had to say about them.
 

Carrie Fairchild

Telly Talk Star
LV
3
 
Awards
7
I have rewatch envy now. 1983 feels like a dim and distant (but very happy) memory to me at this point. Enjoy.
I’m really enjoying them. What I find quite interesting, which if I remember correctly, you discussed in your posts at the time you were rewatching, is how segregated the characters are, even four months into the show. The only time we’ve seen the majority of them together was in the Grants house on New Year’s Eve. Since then, the only interactions have been a scene or two between Gavin, Petra & the Huntingdons regarding Gavin’s eyesore of a work shed and then Heather & Roger unsuccessfully trying to get Lucy and Sheila to sign a petition against said shed.

It’s a realistic approach to how neighbours interact with each other but must have been a bit of a culture shock for traditional soap viewers, used to seeing all of the regulars cross over with each other in the pub or workplace. And I’m enjoying all of the mini dramas that are taking place within each house - Sheila discovering that Karen is on the pill while Barry is carrying on with a horny housewife (played by Eldorado’s Hilary Crane) that he’s building an extension for. Paul Collins’ ongoing struggle with finding work while daughter Lucy dreams of escaping what she regards as the “poverty trap” of living in Brookside. Even the lighter stuff around Roger getting nabbed for not having a TV license or him being surprised to discover that Heather’s childhood friend that is coming for dinner is a nun, is all perfectly watchable.

While I’m enjoying it as it is, I’m also curious to see how things changed in mid-1983 in response to the low ratings. I’m aware of the arrival of the Cross couple and the reduction in swearing. I’m wondering will Bobby’s workplace union stuff get reduced because while it’s topical, it’s been a mainstay since the series began. I do wonder if it was a turnoff for viewers who were going through the same thing in real life and didn’t want to come home and watch it all again on TV in the evening.
 

James from London

International Treasure
LV
6
 
Awards
18
While I’m enjoying it as it is, I’m also curious to see how things changed in mid-1983
The first bit of "retooling", as we'd probably call it now, though that might be too strong a term, I noticed on Brookside was about six weeks in, Christmas '82 or thereabouts, when Heather, who initially was simply a complete cow to Roger, and Sheila, who started off treating her kids really harshly, especially Karen, each gradually became a more sympathetic character.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
What I find quite interesting, which if I remember correctly, you discussed in your posts at the time you were rewatching, is how segregated the characters are, even four months into the show.

Yes. I love the fact that the households were "islanded" which was so refreshing. Even as I watch 1990 episodes, I still find myself measuring the series by that standard. In almost every episode, there's part of me that's aware that the more people's lives all overlap in a traditionally soapy, non-boundaried way, the more artificial it feels and the less I enjoy it. It also feels strongly to me that this has contributed to the drop in the series' quality, even though it's far from the only reason.




I’m aware of the arrival of the Cross couple and the reduction in swearing.

There's a character who arrives in March, six months ahead of the Crosses, who brings a bit of a shift in tone.





Heather, who initially was simply a complete cow to Roger, and Sheila, who started off treating her kids really harshly, especially Karen, each gradually became a more sympathetic character.

It's interesting to think about how things in the longer term might have looked had they stuck with their original personas. I'll take what we got, of course, because it's been brilliant, but I was very pleasantly surprised by how much attitude Sheila in particular had towards her family at the beginning.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Can I just say that I love reading these updates and please dont stop watching when Billy and Sheila leave!

Very nice of you,McKenzie. Glad you're enjoying the discussion in here.

For myself, I think I'll have to check out around that time, even if it only ends up being an extended break. Watch this space, though... anything could happen.

Are you still watching the series yourself? Last time I think you were somewhere around February '83, but I know that was a while back.
 

McKenzie

Telly Talk Member
LV
0
 
Very nice of you,McKenzie. Glad you're enjoying the discussion in here.

For myself, I think I'll have to check out around that time, even if it only ends up being an extended break. Watch this space, though... anything could happen.

Are you still watching the series yourself? Last time I think you were somewhere around February '83, but I know that was a while back.
Oh yeah I've been rattling through them - I'm up to early 1990 now. Didnt realise how irritating Sinbad used to be. I quite like Jonathan and Harry so I'll be disappointed when they go to be replaced by the likes of Ron Dixon.

I do find it quite fascinating watching characters I consider from different eras - like Billy and Mick - interacting. Made all the more interesting after the recent Hollyoaks stuff.

I never saw any of the 91-93 period so I'm definitely going to watch that. I do recall around 2000 was when I finally checked out but the quality had been questionable for a few years.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Oh yeah I've been rattling through them - I'm up to early 1990 now.

Well, I was amazed at how fast you'd whizzed through, but then I realised that I watched the first year's worth of episodes in the space of a month, and things only slowed down when I caught up with the STV drops.

It won't be long now until you've caught up with the "current" STV episodes yourself.
 

McKenzie

Telly Talk Member
LV
0
 
Well, I was amazed at how fast you'd whizzed through, but then I realised that I watched the first year's worth of episodes in the space of a month, and things only slowed down when I caught up with the STV drops.

It won't be long now until you've caught up with the "current" STV episodes yourself.
Yes I've been looking forward to getting up to speed so I can comment in 'real time' so to speak.
 

McKenzie

Telly Talk Member
LV
0
 
Whilst I am aware that there are many current regulars who leave in 1990 to my knowledge the quality doesnt drop off to the point of not watchable to the mid to late 90s? There is a lot of good stuff to come. It does seem bizarre in some ways there is such a change in this year but I can only assume some of them are not planned (eg the Collins, I read online they had stories planned until 1994 - before Doreen Sloane's death).

I think Billy and Sheila leaving was probably necessary for Barry's development so that is understandable but I would have kept Jonathan and Harry personally (although I read he wanted to leave when it went to 3 days a week?)
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Whilst I am aware that there are many current regulars who leave in 1990 to my knowledge the quality doesnt drop off to the point of not watchable to the mid to late 90s?

From memory, I'd say it generally got worse as the Nineties went on, but even in 1990 I'm finding that the watchability of the series is variable depending who is on screen.



It does seem bizarre in some ways there is such a change in this year but I can only assume some of them are not planned (eg the Collins, I read online they had stories planned until 1994 - before Doreen Sloane's death).

Yes, 1990 is almost certainly the most significant year in the series' history when it comes to departures.

Regarding the Collinses, I haven't read too much about the behind-the-scenes with this, other than the official line that the Collinses were written out by necessity when Doreen died. I have wondered if other ways were considered that would have kept the rest of the family for longer.




I think Billy and Sheila leaving was probably necessary for Barry's development so that is understandable but I would have kept Jonathan and Harry personally (although I read he wanted to leave when it went to 3 days a week

I feel the increase to three weekly episodes might have factored in to a number of the departures. I'm sure it would have involved contractual changes and probably a bigger workload (not that I've got anything to substantiate these suspicions).

If it was a choice between having Billy and Sheila or Barry being developed, I know I'd have preferred the former. In general I'd say that Barry was more interesting with Sheila and Billy around, too (but there's probably a case to be made either way). Phil Redmond's book mentions "Sue and John headed for theatre-land", so I suppose the official line was that they wanted to do more theatre work.
 

McKenzie

Telly Talk Member
LV
0
 
From memory, I'd say it generally got worse as the Nineties went on, but even in 1990 I'm finding that the watchability of the series is variable depending who is on screen.

Yes, 1990 is almost certainly the most significant year in the series' history when it comes to departures.

Regarding the Collinses, I haven't read too much about the behind-the-scenes with this, other than the official line that the Collinses were written out by necessity when Doreen died. I have wondered if other ways were considered that would have kept the rest of the family for longer.

I feel the increase to three weekly episodes might have factored in to a number of the departures. I'm sure it would have involved contractual changes and probably a bigger workload (not that I've got anything to substantiate these suspicions).

If it was a choice between having Billy and Sheila or Barry being developed, I know I'd have preferred the former. In general I'd say that Barry was more interesting with Sheila and Billy around, too (but there's probably a case to be made either way). Phil Redmond's book mentions "Sue and John headed for theatre-land", so I suppose the official line was that they wanted to do more theatre work.
Yeah I perhaps worded that badly, I'd have rather kept B&S but as they left they used to the opportunity to change up Barry's character. To mixed results as you say.
Yeah I perhaps worded that badly, I'd have rather kept Billy and Shelia but as they left they used to the opportunity to evolve Barry's character. To mixed results as you say.
I'd seen an interview with Mark Burgess who said they had high level plans for the Collins to 94. It does seem a long time in the future granted so I'm not sure how accurate it was.
From the episodes I've seen on youtube (which is quite a lot) my impression is that 89/90 is a bit of a grind but once the new cast are settled and the parade opens then it does improve for a few years after 91 - until the Simpsons era in my opinion.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
I'd have rather kept Billy and Shelia but as they left they used to the opportunity to evolve Barry's character. To mixed results as you say.

Oh good. For a minute I thought you weren't too bothered about Billy and Sheila leaving, which for me is going to be one of the bigger blows to the series. Glad we're on the same page (even though I'm open to a different perspective as well).



I'd seen an interview with Mark Burgess who said they had high level plans for the Collins to 94. It does seem a long time in the future granted so I'm not sure how accurate it was.

Funnily enough, I was skimming through Phil Redmond's book earlier and he mentions they'd fly the writing team off to sunny locations where they'd plan future storylines. The example I read was where they went to Majorca where - among other things - he pitched the idea of the Jordache saga. Even before he floated it out, his plan went from paving the way for their introduction all the way through to the body under the patio and beyond. So that was a year or two plotted, with him also being very clear that he wanted the story to continue for two years after the body was buried. I know this was a particularly huge story, unlike the lower octane type of fare the Collinses usually got, but it does show that the team was open to planning way ahead.





From the episodes I've seen on youtube (which is quite a lot) my impression is that 89/90 is a bit of a grind but once the new cast are settled and the parade opens then it does improve for a few years after 91 - until the Simpsons era in my opinion.

This delineation is interesting to me since I tend to group most of the early Nineties stuff together, with the exception of the more sensationalist stuff. If and when I dive into the post-Billy and Sheila era this will definitely be something to bear in mind.

Coincidentally, another thing I'd read today was that when the Simpson era wasn't setting the screen alight, Phil Redmond exercised his power to issue a dictate that no episode - or part episode - must start or end with them. The other time he'd previously done that was with the Chois (I'm not sure how accurate this claim is, though. I'm sure I remember Michael getting an ending or two in the latter stages of his time on the show).
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Episodes 807 - 836
16 July -21 September 1990


In recent episodes I noticed a number of scenes that are, in the best kind of way, quite lengthy and dialogue-heavy. It occurs to me that these might be a positive by-product of the 50% weekly episode increase, with stories now having a little more breathing room. As I write this my mind goes to American daytime soaps, which I think are notorious for glacial pacing with two characters on one set often having one conversation that drags on laboriously for several episodes. This is different. These scenes mostly come from character and feel like a deeper dive into their inner worlds while other events are going on around them. It feels balanced.

Before Sammy left for her chambermaid course in Blackpool, for example, Owen sat down with her and poured his heart out as they reminisced. It had pages of dialogue for Owen in particular, and both did really nice work. It also made Sammy’s choice to then depart without saying goodbye to Owen more poignant, reinforced by the sight of him arriving to get the news from Chrissy, handing her a present he’d wrapped for Sammy and walking away dejectedly.

Naturally, Sheila and Billy - no stranger to such scenes - had another in which Sheila told Billy about Barry’s biological father (where both, to my ears, clearly enunciated the name “Paddy” more than once, leaving me to feel I’d missed something). This time round the revelation was only softened by knowing it was coming. I disliked it then. I dislike it now. It smacks of The Producer’s Revenge… a way to further demonise Bobby’s character because of their feelings towards Ricky Tomlinson. I just don’t believe it, and everything we’ve seen on screen over the last eight years tells us it’s simply been pulled out of thin air in 1990.

Dialogue has sparkled at times, with one late July episode causing me to prick up my ears and become interested to know who wrote lines such as Terry’s bitter “Life’s a bitch an’ then you marry one”; Billy’s “A man chases a girl until she catches him”, and Barry’s comeback to “Baron Hardup” Jonathan proclaiming that he doesn’t let emotion get in the way of business: “So your girlfriends tell me”. It was Maurice Bessman.

Barry’s enmities are sparking at the moment. As well as his bitterness towards Jonathan for knowing about Daniel’s parentage and for putting the house on the market - and, no doubt also for telling Barry he can stay no longer - he is also still hugely resentful to Billy. That one’s fascinating to watch because of the layers and the fact that both make efforts to bury their real feelings about the other when Sheila is around.

Rod The Plod returned just in time for Billy and Sheila’s wedding (for which Billy was not on time, creating a soapy storm in a teacup) and best of all Karen made a final return to the series for the event, giving us a full complement of adult Grant and Corkhill offspring and creating endlessly watchable dynamics at the wedding and reception. Jonathan’s attendance also felt like an opportunity for reflection on his time on the series as he remembered the summer garden party for his wedding to Laura some three years earlier.

The cloud on the horizon was the Godden business, with Jimmy hiding a wreath they’d been sent so as not to spoil the day before it all eventually came up to the surface. While comfortably within the realm of many people’s reality, to me it feels slightly outlandish and un-relatable. Not more so than Tommy McArdle’s antics, of course and possibly not even Demon Duane of the earliest episodes. Perhaps at this point I’m just a little weary of gangster and hard-man themed storylines.

Other storylines have dragged as well. There was a window of time when it felt Sinbad was in every scene, dragging the show down with him. And as always, the less said about Sue the better.

More exciting was Doreen’s final ride on the merry-go-round with a three episode return. It’s always wonderful to see her and this was no exception. Still, there was a sense of it being time-limited. Things moved quickly with a little less depth than Doreen’s previous returns. At times there was even a sense of re-treading old ground with matters that seemed somewhat laid to rest on Doreen’s previous return.

The functional nature of the short arc is possibly best summed up by the scene in which we join Doreen and Jimmy chatting. They’re already discussing Godden, with Doreen advocating getting their retaliation in first. This is conveniently overheard by Sheila who asks Jimmy to leave the room so they can talk about the real reason Doreen is back. Within a couple of minutes Sheila is packing Doreen’s things and telling her to “get out of my house*. Then she opens the garage door (which made me chuckle as I had forgotten it was still there until Sheila opened one of the “walls) and boots Doreen out, shouting at her, where Billy and Tracy are conveniently standing, having arrived right on cue. Adding insult to injury, Billy and Tracy immediately accept what’s going on with Tracy even standing alongside Sheila to turn down Doreen’s offer to return to Bristol with her. It’s all perfectly watchable, and a nice Easter egg as Billy and Sheila’s time on the show draws to a close, but it felt just a tad more underwhelming than I’d have hoped.

As with Doreen’s previous return, I found myself feeling sympathy for her. The writing played up Doreen as the “scheming bitch” (Jimmy’s words in his warning to Sheila), but overall the arc wasn’t a good look for Sheila who came across as insecure, ungracious and possessive. Sheila - still a relative newcomer to Number Ten - telling Doreen to “get out of my house” seemed a step too far, but this could be partly down to my feelings as a viewer.

Doreen isn’t the only yo-yo-ing-ex-who-abandoned-her-family to feature in this run. Josie running off to be with Tony and returning every time they have a barney is already feeling stale. The dynamic does feel truthful and is played as such. There’s good chemistry between Suzanne Packer and Louis Emerick and I can also understand how he’d be blinded by his feelings towards her. I also appreciate how unapologetically brash and self-centred Josie is (almost to the point I can imagine her fitting into the early years). But the fact remains it isn't pleasant to watch. With current Brookside writing standards somewhat lower than earlier years, we know little about Josie, and much of what we do know isn’t endearing, so it feels the character’s main function is to elicit viewer sympathy for Mick. At the same time, Mick loses self-respect each time he tells her this is the last time she’ll give him the runaround and this time he really, really means it. We know he doesn't like her trotting off to be with another man while keeping the door open, but it keeps happening all the same to the point it's feeling quite repetitive. He’s stronger, more interesting and more watchable without Josie, but even that has its limits. It’s quietly pleasing that it’s taken a while to clear out Harry’s old furniture, but the fact that it’s happening is a reminder that the bungalow is changing irrevocably, as is the series.

And as it’s out with the old, it’s in with the Farnhams, who continue the Chois’ middle-class non-traditional family setup whilst also serving spiritual successors to Number Nine’s traditionally Yuppie couples the Huntingtons and the Gordon-Davieses. Their initial episodes show potential, particularly with a little conflict with Frank Rogers when Max accused Growler of theft after Growler and Bumper’s Damon-esque antics when helping the Farnhams move boxes. Margaret is problem solving whilst her trying to sort out her job description when Max has her ironing his shirts and cooking for him is a new wrinkle (on the page, Margaret is shown to be competent and practical, though the actress hasn’t convinced me she knows her earth from her life). There’s even a throwback to The Early Years, with Max’s botched alarm driving the neighbours to distraction, just as Roger Huntingtons did almost eight years before.

The only people still on the Close from the time of the original alarm chaos are Sheila and Barry (with Terry somewhere in Bumper territory at the time: the bezzie mate who visited occasionally but lived elsewhere). Indeed, Sheila remarks more than once that it’s eight years since she moved in as she and Billy prepare to leave.

Sheila said:
When I came here eight years ago I thought “That’s it. We’ve got a house that belongs to us after all these years of paying rent.” I mean, really, does it matter? …My marriage broke up for all sorts of reasons. I could have been left for dead but instead I found you, almost on my doorstep. An’ I was lucky I found you. I wanna be with you. I wanna have a chance with you… Please, come with us.

It’s worth noting that Damon was spoken about fondly, with Sheila telling Barry that out of all the terrible things that had happened to her, Damon’s death is the worst. Bobby was mentioned as well, with Barry pointing out that Bobby would have handled the Godden business less foolishly and Sheila conceding that he was right.




continued...
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44


Episodes 807 - 836
16 July -21 September 1990
continued



Even as their final episode began, no real mention had been made of Sheila and Billy leaving, other than Billy suggesting Sheila and Claire should leave for a while to stay with Margaret (Sheila’s sister, not the Farnhams’ nanny) and I was beginning to wonder if I’d confused my episodes. The headstone through the window being the clincher required some suspension of disbelief. Both Billy and Sheila had been through too much for this to seem a dealbreaker to them living on the Close. As Barry commented, Godden is small fry compared with Tommy McArdle.

There’s also a suggestion that Billy and Sheila’s exit might just be temporary, as though trying to pacify the audience until they adjust to the idea. This approach has been used a number of times in recent years. Harry is the most glaring example, but not the only one. As a choice it feels a little too safe for this series.

Still, though, considering the times, Billy and Sheila’s departure was really best case scenario in terms of giving me some closure to my viewing. I’d feared they might simply fade from view two-thirds of the way into an episode, leaving things even more open-ended. As it was, Sheila and Billy were given some closure at the end of the episode waved off by Tracy, Jimmy and Barry, with Barry and Billy even shaking hands. There was a mini cliffhanger tagged on to the end with Barry telling Jimmy they were going after Godden, but I’m choosing to interpret this as a sign that life in the Close will go on even as I stroll off in the happy couple’s wake, quietly choking on the fumes of Billy’s Datsun Sunny.

VZ6bhl.jpg
lJXqGd.jpg


WPgwY7.jpg
EMLWaQ.jpg


rlgNPO.jpg
iYrbi2.jpg


yNVKAV.jpg
4KfaD5.jpg


M0bWXR.jpg


Mc8Xwg.jpg
o2COTT.jpg


BxsN6q.jpg


OELwe9.jpg
HaXnTm.jpg


IvOoyT.jpg
ncIP9v.jpg


kVRR7Y.jpg
1CSkR4.jpg
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Hollyoaks
6632-6634 / Hollyoaks Later 2025 Special / 6635
20 - 27 October 2025


I decided to go all in and watch a couple of episodes before the crossover hoping to contextualise things and... it was exhausting!


That kind of reminded me of when everyone came back for the "last" episode of Neighbours: completely daft and genuinely very sweet. I guess that makes Bobby, Sheila and Billy the Jason, Kylie and Guy Pearce of Liverpool.

It was quite like that in a way. A bit of a whistle stop tour with a good few Easter eggs thrown in. Some of the storyline connections may be a bit questionable in terms of history but it was fun to see them all back onscreen.

Absolutely. If there was one thing the two earlier Hollyoaks episodes achieved, it was for me to understand that we weren't going to be going deep. From what I can see, it's a "plot"-driven series where stuff just happens and it's best not to think about it (not that there's time). I was glad to get to Brookside Close for a brief respite and some welcome familiarity.

The strangeness of Sheila and Billy now residing at Number Five was nothing compared with the zany goings on in Chester, so my happiness at seeing Sheila back in her rightful habitat wasn't going to be diminished.

So nice to see a Sheila/Bobby reunion, but it was also fun to watch Barry and Billy share a scene after so recently watching their uncomfortable final handshake. Overall I think it covered just enough ground to tick the nostalgia box without going overboard and explaining too much.

It's a nice touch that Jacqui Dixon's daughter was played by Alexandra Fletcher's daughter, looking and sounding very much like Jackie herself when she first arrived on the Close (before she went upmarket and changed the spelling of her name). And of course it doesn't pay to think that Jacqui is now not-Jacqui on Hollyoaks.

I had no idea who the blonde woman with Tinhead was and when I looked it up I recognised the name Nikki Shadwick but could not tell you a thing about the character.

It made sense to have representation from different Brookside eras, though. Judging from the soul-destroying responses from Hollyoaks and late-era Brookie cast in this video, it seems everyone bar one only remembers the sensationalist pap from the Nineties onwards (fortunately, Louis Emerick saves the day):


It was interesting to see one of the terraces at the bottom end of the Close (Number Two) used as Gemma's home. It makes sense for the character, but I suspect the choice was more logistical, based on where they could get permission to film interiors. I thought the character looked a little young, and indeed the actress wasn't born until 1993, when OG Gemma would have been seven or eight years old.

The contrivance behind Mick and Sinbad being brought back was the elephant in the room. Thankfully, after a couple of episodes of Hollyoaks this was water off a duck's back.

Sir Phil's little walk-on was nice. "Story of my life, mate: one drama to another" was the line of the week.


After the mini nostalgia-fest of the 7pm episode, I’d recommend avoiding this Later episode because if you’re expecting to see more throwbacks, you’ll be disappointed.

I wish I'd heeded this. The end of the episode immediately before Later left me curious to see more of the Brookie stuff, and I thought I'd watch this in order to then see how it crossed back over to the regular series (where I knew Billy would be reappearing), but can't say I enjoyed watching.

Based on what I've seen, Hollyoaks is an exhausting series to watch. Even bearing in mind this seems to be some kind of "event week", there's just too much going on to care. The first couple of episodes I watched had about half a dozen back from the deads, and people getting shot left, right and centre. Jacqui Dixon's groom had knocked up about four different women who were all pregnant at the same time (if we include the one who was wearing the fake bump). And that's notwithstanding the plane they dropped onto the wedding. Then there are the convoluted love triangles and quadrangles, and every other character is gay (the one that looks like Rylan had about four different guys clamouring after him across the two versions of the show, at least one of whom was supposed to be dead, of course). It feels it's trying too hard to shock and push boundaries, which comes at the expense of character. The Scum-like rape was particularly distasteful because you just know it's going to be sold as addressing an important issue when it's really just screaming for attention and ratings.

I also found the performances varied greatly. Some are decent, some really are not. Others seem to be going for camp. It's easy to tell the ones who have been on the show more than a few years because they look tired. Sparky white veneers, tans, filled lips and botoxed foreheads don't mask this. They just look artificial and tired.

Added to this is the culture shock of jumping forward three and a half decades and finding the way people talk quite different. Most of the under Forties frequently start sentences with "OK" or end sentences with "yeah?". There are also Americanisms all over the place with characters saying "I'm done with this" or asking for a "vodka tonic" (instead of the more self-explanatory "vodka and tonic"). These are, of course, an accurate reflection of the way these expressions have become assimilated into British culture, but it still felt glaring when watched back-to-back with 1990 Brookie, a time when regional language had stronger identity.

One fun thing was seeing how text messages or missed calls have been worked into the story, appearing on screen as characters read them (I've seen this done elsewhere in newer series or films, but it's good to see it works in soap as well). I can fall into the trap of thinking that mobiles have spoilt a lot of soap tropes, but I liked seeing how they're used to become part of the drama.

Anyway, I'm sure there's a market for this outrageousness, and perhaps I would have been up for it at some point (certainly, I loved Sons and Daughters and Melrose Place when they got OTT), but I needed a lie down in a dark room after a few episodes.
 
Top