Did you miss Michael and Olivia?

Did you miss Michael and Olivia?

  • I missed both of them.

    Votes: 6 54.5%
  • I missed Michael, but not Olivia.

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • I missed Olivia, but not Michael.

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • I didn't miss either of them.

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11

Monzo

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
1
 
Awards
9
We got to see Michael and Olivia grow up in Knots Landing, but as adults, they were no longer needed in the show. Would you have liked to see them for longer? Would you have been happy if one of Karen's children had been on the show from start to finish? And should more have been done with Olivia after Abby went to Japan? Or should she have disappeared with her mother right away?

Did you miss Michael and Olivia, or was their departure not a big loss for the show?
 

Toni

Maximum Member
LV
11
 
Awards
24
Remembering how useless and boring they were in their last season, neither Michael nor Olivia were really needed in the show anymore. However...

If Michael had stayed on, we would´ve never had Jason, which is ok for me. And I´d take one Olivia eye rolling (à la Laura) over all the silliness that we had to endure from Kate... She was the true heiress to Laura...

1777240473674.png

Here she´s really thinking "WTF Mum, again?"​
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
I think Michael was pretty much played out, but I would have liked to see how Olivia and Harold's marriage progressed - more of Harold at Knots Landing Motors and Olivia growing a a business woman. I guess the latter was already covered by Paige, though.
 

Daniel Avery

Admin
LV
9
 
Awards
24
I think Michael was pretty much played out
His character suffered mostly because they could not (or maybe would not) allow him to genuinely move on to independent adulthood. To better achieve this, they needed to de-emphasize his relationship with Karen, a character who tended to dominate all their interactions. Obviously they couldn't just dis-own one another, but he needed to be seen doing more things on his own without Karen trying to offer "advice" (smothering him). Though they made an effort by having him work at Sumner Group, they never allowed him to fully cut the apron strings. In order to become more of an independent character they should have de-emphasized his Fairgate roots in favor of his future.

A modern comparison (and well-executed solution) occurred last year on General Hospital, coincidentally with a character named Michael. He'd also grown up on the show with a domineering, frequently smothering mother named Carly who meant well but refused to see him as an adult even as he married, had children, ran his family company, etc. In the effort to make Michael "his own man," they had him leave town for several months, then returned him with a slightly older recast who didn't physically resemble the previous actor. Most notably, the new actor is rarely if ever seen in scenes with the actress who plays his mother. He's going about his life raising two kids while juggling relations with his unglued ex-wife and his ex-hooker girlfriend. Carly is a non-factor in his stories, and it's no longer a chore to watch him. The "fresh start" has made an incredible difference in the character and how people see him, and the change has even made his mother a bit more palatable (only a tiny bit). She isn't obsessing over her son's love life, his custody battle with the ex, or even trying to break up his romance with the hooker.

It seemed that the then-writers of Knots preferred to write for characters like Paige and Linda rather than Michael or Olivia. But can you imagine the cringey carnage if they had opted to do a Linda-style revamp of the character of Michael?
 
Top