I listened to it so you don't have to.
The basic format is an extended Siskel & Ebert style movie discussion between two commentators. I skimmed through the section on CHARIOTS OF FIRE. I've never seen the movie and I doubt I ever will. Those 80s "prestige" films are always long, ponderous and dry as dust. (I agree with the one guy here. Based on the title, a movie about gladiators with flame throwing chariots would have been a much more intriguing story!)
The section on MOMMIE DEAREST was bit more interesting. The one reviewer had a standard reaction: bad fanfic alternating between dull and gross. The other guy had a more more alarming reaction: admiration for Joan. Not the real Joan, mind you, who despite her flaws I think did have some very Scarlett O'Hara qualities that are hard not to admire. But Dunaway-as-Crawford is a monstrous caricature. MOMMIE DEAREST is such a bad, muddled movie reflected in how many people watch a film about a child abuser and feel more empathy for the abuser than the victim-child. Something about this movie is deeply askew that it elicits so little sympathy for Christina.