Menu
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Awards
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Global Telly Talk
Classic US TV
Three's Company
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daniel Avery" data-source="post: 438543" data-attributes="member: 27"><p>...and maybe part of the reason <em>Three's A Crowd </em>was DOA was because the producers over-estimated the audience's willingness to follow Ritter/Jack to a new setting without DeWitt, Barnes, Knotts, etc. Struggling spin-offs often send in actors from the "mother ship" to help remind viewers of that old magic, but the way those others were 'discarded' made it highly unlikely they would want to reprise their roles in guest shots on TAC. Heck, they may have secretly enjoyed watching TAC go down in flames.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daniel Avery, post: 438543, member: 27"] ...and maybe part of the reason [I]Three's A Crowd [/I]was DOA was because the producers over-estimated the audience's willingness to follow Ritter/Jack to a new setting without DeWitt, Barnes, Knotts, etc. Struggling spin-offs often send in actors from the "mother ship" to help remind viewers of that old magic, but the way those others were 'discarded' made it highly unlikely they would want to reprise their roles in guest shots on TAC. Heck, they may have secretly enjoyed watching TAC go down in flames. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
6 + 4 =
Post reply
Forums
Global Telly Talk
Classic US TV
Three's Company
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
