What was the last film you watched?

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
2
 
Awards
9
That's being 90 years old for all eternity.

I don't recall a single thing about PROMETHEUS -- which tells me what I thought of the film -- other than waiting for the payoff of why Guy Pierce was playing a 90-year old in heavy makeup. As I recall, there was no such payoff, leaving it inexplicable.

a terrible film that made me instantly remove the sequel from my watch list.
I have no fondness for either films, but the sequel trots out of a lot of the villains from the original cartoons, which is a bit of fun. You can get the gist of that, though, from a few clips on Youtube.

I also have a smidge of resentment towards these movies. Gen X pop culture repackaged for Millennials, who then have more nostalgia for the cruddy remakes than the originals. See also: Jim Carrey's Grinch.
 

Angela Channing

World Cup of Soaps Moderator
LV
19
 
Awards
52
The Mastermind (2025)

MV5BYmEzYzMwZDUtMjdiYi00YmRlLWJiNjYtYzY2N2E3ZWZjOTcxXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg


The Mastermind (2025) is a subversion of the heist genre in that is doesn't have exciting action sequences but is more of a deeply layered character study of the main character who plans a robbery, played by Josh O'Connor (who seems to be everywhere these days). Set in 1970s Massachusetts, the film follows JB Moony (Josh O’Connor), an unemployed carpenter, who masterminds a plan to steal four valuable paintings from a local art gallery. The film focuses on the unglamorous side of the heist and attention is on the mundane planning, the fumbled execution and the messy aftermath as JB tries to get out of the failures of his botched robbery. The film looks like it had a relatively small budget but that doesn't stop it from being quite gripping and beautifully paced.
 

Angela Channing

World Cup of Soaps Moderator
LV
19
 
Awards
52
Eternity (2025)

MV5BNzlmZTNiOTAtNzhlOC00ZTA1LWJhNTgtMDQ4YmY4NWIyNTA4XkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg


This is a romantic drama with some elements of humour rather than being a romcom. It has the interesting premise of what choice an individual would make in the after life. The story follows Joan (Elizabeth Olsen) as she arrives at a transit hub for dead people where they must choose a time from their past that they are to inhabit for all of eternity. Joan faces a emotional dilemma of having to choose between the husband she spent sixty years with (Miles Teller) and her first love (Callum Turner), who died decades earlier and has been waiting for her. The film asks whether a "perfect" moment in Joan's past is more valuable than the messy reality of her life fully lived. This isn't Shakespeare but its an entertaining film that makes you think about what you would do in similar circumstances.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
I wonder if Prometheus was meant to be a completely different sci-fi story, and that the studio was only willing to fund it if he would cram it into the Alien franchise.

That would be very easy to believe but I don't believe it would be the case. After Alien vs. Predator peed all over the franchise Ridley Scott opted out of the sequel he was planning and I believe deliberately chose to make a prequel but with only a tenuous connection to the Xenomorph (since it was retrospectively applied to the creature only in the sequels, the "X" word chokes me in the same kind of way you choke on "franchise"). The studio's line in the sand was that Ridley himself had to direct it, and they refused to make it with a director he'd handpicked.

I believe the follow-up film, Covenant, suffered more from studio interference since Scott wanted to continue exploring the "AI as the Big Bad" theme, while the studio insisted on taking things into more familiar Alien territory.



I have no fondness for either films, but the sequel trots out of a lot of the villains from the original cartoons, which is a bit of fun.

Oh, that's interesting. Was there actually a rogues gallery of villains that were known? I only watched casually, but my memory is of every reveal being some variation on the creepy groundskeeper or whatever (something the 2002 film poked fun at in its opening scene).



I also have a smidge of resentment towards these movies. Gen X pop culture repackaged for Millennials, who then have more nostalgia for the cruddy remakes than the originals.

I hear you on that one.




The story follows Joan (Elizabeth Olsen) as she arrives at a transit hub for dead people where they must choose a time from their past that they are to inhabit for all of eternity. Joan faces a emotional dilemma of having to choose between the husband she spent sixty years with (Miles Teller) and her first love (Callum Turner), who died decades earlier and has been waiting for her. The film asks whether a "perfect" moment in Joan's past is more valuable than the messy reality of her life fully lived.

This is one of those examples where the concept itself is so very fascinating I find myself wondering if the film could live up to it.
 

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
2
 
Awards
9
Was there actually a rogues gallery of villains that were known?

Not a rogues gallery, which would imply some reoccurrence. And yes, the culprit was always Farmer Johnson wearing a mask rather than an actual ghost. At least in the original batch. Later versions of Scooby Do had the gang going up against actual monsters.

I haven't seen a Scooby Doo cartoon in decades, but some of these one-time appearance fraud-villains are seared into my memory. I don't recall how the second live action movie handled them, but quite a few of them were in the movie.

1767725064266.jpeg
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
I haven't seen a Scooby Doo cartoon in decades, but some of these one-time appearance fraud-villains are seared into my memory.

Now there's a visual, some of these look quite familiar to me.




It's a high concept film but it's not executed in a deep and profound way, and it's probably all the better for it.

It's often better to keep these things simple. Even from just reading the concept I've already found myself beginning to wonder which time from my past I would choose.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
The Contract (2006)

iu

When flicking through Prime, this was added to my watchlist as soon as I saw the two lead actors. I was a little surprised I hadn't heard of it, but then took a quick glance to see who else was it in it and happened to read that it had a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes (which I assume is bad). I don't put much stock in this, since so many of these reviews are driven by insecurity or a need to fit in with what's written by peers. And there's no accounting for taste anyway. Still, having also seen something about production issues I went in with expectations well and truly in check.

To me this felt at times like a TV movie (and it did go straight to home media, so I suppose it technically is). The production values at times suggest a lower budget than one would expect to attract Hollywood heavyweights. It does have some ambitious set pieces and stunts that mostly work, but not always 100%. There's a helicopter crash that sums up the conflict of the big moments. The exteriors show the copter falling apart and rotors flying off and it feels subjective and terrifying. Then we cut to inside, and it feels like the budget had run out so they just asked the cameraman to shake the camera as though they're making an episode of The Young Doctors or something. It's not just the big moments, though. Some of the character scenes - particularly early on in the film - feel a little flat (this was where I go the TV movie feel from), with exposition a tad clunkier than I would expect.

All this aside, I don't understand the evident hate for it, other than people are more offended by something average than they are something terrible.

When it gets going and the premise is established, it works. This is particularly true after Cusack meets Freeman's character and has the horrible dilemma where he has to weigh up the evils and decide how to react. It's a horrible situation to be in, and provoked a degree of anxiety in me. In this regard it's quite Hitchcockian, since Cusack is our everyman and a character to whom the audience can easily relate. As he tries to work out what's real and who can be trusted it becomes compelling. It turns out this is also true for Freeman's character since not all his friends are friends. In terms of story there are also similarities at times to the big screen version of The Fugitive.

To my eyes it's not a bad film. Actually, it's good. It's just not Freeman/Cusack great.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
The Stunt Man (1980)

1767798289101.png

A film about making a film directed by a larger than life character played by Peter O'Toole.
The recurring trick is that everyone on set except for the stunt man protagonist is playing by the script. What looks like a stunt going terribly wrong turns out be the scene they intended to film.
The stunt man (Steve Railsback) is actually a distressed and down on his luck Vietnam returnee who accidentally ends up in the production of a WWI movie, and the bizarreness could be interpreted as his personal distorted experience. On the other hand, we don't know if the ambitious director can be trusted.

The camera techniques are mind-bogglingly masterful, many close-up scenes are framed in 5 or more different ways so that it almost looks like 3-D. Feeling sucked into the scenery I unintentionally tried to wave away a thick smoke or fog that appeared on screen.
Romantic sub-plots have the reputation of "interfering" with the meatiest parts, but Barbara Hershey does it with a lot of vigor and joy, thus making herself essential to the story.

I found it a terrific experience, and even though the film has a good reputation it's relatively obscure in the context of "best films of the 1980s".
Maybe it had something to do with lack of proper marketing, and in fact - just like The Long Good Friday - it's a film from 1979 that was delayed for release.
The second disc features the nearly two hours (!) The Sinister Saga Of Making 'The Stunt Man' documentary but I'll save it for later.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Good Will Hunting (1997)

iu

As always, I feel I need to make my excuses for waiting the best part of three decades before finally watching this film. Thing is, though,I don't know what my excuse is. It may have to do with a mild aversion to Robin Williams, but I couldn't swear to it. Regardless, it has been on my radar since it came out.

My image of the film was of something sentimental, warm and whimsical. Only the first two are arguably present, and in smaller quantities than I'd envisaged. I was pleasantly surprised by the grittiness to the film, particularly when it came to Will and his gang. Their bravado, predilection for sometimes violent confrontations and their earthy language reminded me of Saturday Night Fever (another film where there's more to it than the poster image).

Will's edge in particular was surprising because one looks at the poster image and sees a wholesome-looking all-American boy, so I'd kind of decided the film was about this nice boy forming a friendship with a teacher who is somewhat remote. Instead, Will is the one with the challenging behaviour, and I really like the idea of one damaged person trying to reach another.

Another surprise was the soundtrack of vintage, folksy songs, sometimes at odds with the imagery on screen (as in the scene where Will and his friends get into a bloody fight in the basketball court). They - along with touches such as the ancient car presented to Will - serve as a reminder that this film is not really of its time and place. Instead there's something timeless about it.

Even though I never actually saw it, this film was my first awareness of either Matt Damon or Ben Affleck. Such was the buzz about it. In many ways, they still feel like these hot new kids on the scene, but what an exciting time this would have been, when they actually were these two relative newbies enjoying double duty as leading men and screenwriters. And what a script this is. Peppered in among the naturalistic prose come a series of winning, lengthy monologues as they use language to break someone down or to build them up. Their Academy Award win was thoroughly deserved.

I feel differently about Robin Williams's win, though. Not because it isn't a great performance - it is - but because, despite the film crediting actors in order of appearance, Williams really got top billing as seen on the poster. To nominate him for Best Supporting Actor is a diabolical cheat. He should have been up against Jack Nicholson, Dustin Hoffman and, yes, even Matt Damon. Williams probably wouldn't have won, but at least it would have been a noble loss rather than a sneaky win.

On the subject of supporting actors, there are so many good turns here, and the chemistry between any combination of actors is off the charts. There's a brilliant scene in a joke shop where Matt Damon and Minnie Driver say their lines while trying on a series of different funny noses and boggle eyes and whatnot, while trying not to corpse. It's very endearing, and feels as though they're simply improvising. Many of Minnie's scenes feel this way. Crucially, it's with her character that Will comes to life and feels complete.

The ending pulls off the combination of satisfying and bittersweet, which works for me.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
I see the title and think, is that RAIN MAN?
No, because the title is GOOD WILL HUNTING.
Oh...then is it FORREST GUMP?

I haven't seen those three movies - intentionally.
Despite Mel's positive review I'm still not convinced, and I also think there's something sneaky about Matt Damon. Maybe he's done that gay4pay thing a few times too many.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
I see the title and think, is that RAIN MAN?
No, because the title is GOOD WILL HUNTING.
Oh...then is it FORREST GUMP?

I tend to conflate GWH with Dead Poets Society. It's that theme of Robin Williams playing a teacher-type character who influences young people. Which is what I thought GWH was all about anyway (and which it is, really).

And (surprise, surprise) I've never watched Dead Poets Society, so I may well have that all wrong as well.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Miss You Already (2015)

iu

Prime's description was tantalisingly vague:
They say opposites attract. Milly (Toni Collette) is the woman who has everything: a successful career; a devoted husband and two gorgeous kids.

And that's it.I didn't even try expanding the text (and this morning I've found out that there wasn't any more if I had). Toni Collette's name and the image of her and Drew Barrymore evidently playing friends was enough for me to click in.

Had I noticed the categorisation (International * Drama * Heavy * Heartwarming) or read up any more on the film, I may not have watched. Not as eagerly, anyway. Fortunately, I was able to watch it unfold organically, and probably for the first thirty minutes or so it would have been difficult to pinpoint what the film was about - beyond a general theme of "friendship" - because there were a number of different focal points.

These different dramas co-existing - relationships and strains; IVF; cancer; financial concerns - brought a soap opera element to it. There's also a kind of Beaches thing going on with the focus on the friendship from childhood on two friends, one of whom is overly dramatic with a narcissistic mother, the other being more grounded and with her own set of problems.

With and American and and America-based-Australian on the poster I'd simply assumed this would be an American film. It was a pleasant surprise to find that it was a British film, written by Morwenna Banks. This meant that it handled its subjects with a matter-of-factness and humour. It's not devoid of sentiment (ultimately, it's still a chick flick with Drew Barrymore) but stops short of mawkishness. It's the most graphic and brutally honest on-screen approach I've seen to a storyline about breast cancer, while stopping short of horror or clobbering the viewer round the head with facts.

The cast includes Paddy Considine, whom I've only really previously seen in Pride, where he was equally good. Jacqueline Bisset is Collette's high maintenance actress mother, while Frances de la Tour has a small-but-hugely-memorable role as a theatrical wigmaker.

Toni Collette is unsurprisingly brilliant, and the chemistry between her and Drew is wonderful. Before Drew was cast, Jennifer Aniston and then Rachel Weisz were set to play opposite Toni. I'm glad it worked out the way it did. Incidentally, Collette mentioned E.T. in one of her lines to Barrymore and I found myself wondering if that line was already in there before Drew was finally cast.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
Walk On The Wild Side (1962)

1768179835240.png

A trashy melodrama with some great Barbara Stanwyck scenes. She bitches, she blackmails, she slaps, and she lusts after her protégé played by Capucine whom I only knew from her supporting role in Joan Collins' SINS mini-series.
In this film, Capucine is almost the spitting image of Joan Crawford, with the high cheekbones and statuesque demeanour.
Most performances are a bit wooden and one-dimensional except for Jane Fonda who even ends up in a catfight.
 
Top