Now, even when I’ve caught bits of regular episodes, it’s just a series of mad stuff happening to characters, to the point that it’s normalised, which I think dilutes the dramatic effect.
Somewhere mid-watch, as I tried to get a handle on these characters and their various ties, I read up some character information on the
Hollyoaks wiki. They were all so extreme and bonkers. It seemed as though every character had been shot, assaulted, died and returned or was responsible for the death of other characters. Then there are all the explosions and crashes and things dropping onto this small village. It all felt so meaningless. Tedious even.
I think you may be thinking of Ste. What I found jarring was that in the earlier episode, his niece is crushed to death by a chimney following the plane crash but the next time you see Ste, a few hours later in the Later episode, he’s running around Liverpool after one of his lovers, who is subsequently mowed down by a car. The continuity is all over the place / non existent.
Absolutely true. Worse still he was running around Liverpool after his
son's lover right after saying how his niece's death had made him realise the importance of being there for children and family. Even by soap standards, there was no logic at all.
The insane thing about this is that it was the producers harking back to the very first Hollyoaks Later episode where Luke Morgan (Gary Lucy) was sexually assaulted. It was them “paying tribute” to the show’s history.
Yikes. Tackier and tackier.
On that note, it raised an eyebrow that as
Hollyoaks Later ended on the C4 app, the next suggested programme was the 1986
Brookie where Sheila was raped. Despite the Redmond connection (and Sheila appearing in the earlier episode), I thought the link was in very poor taste and it made me wonder about the mindset of whoever curates these suggestions.