- Awards
- 6
Russia uses China and China uses Russia right now. It will be a fight to see which one turns on the other 1st.
- Awards
- 8
Ridiculous and Preposterous assertions.
The US is not invading Canada, and Canada would have been invaded long ago, without US Prescence
You think Russia and China would leave Canada alone without the US? LOL
And get off your high horse
And Canada wouldn't have removed S Hussein and intervened in Kosovo on its own
So when will Canada meet its NATO obligation?
Nothing more about your insensitive about the Kirks I see
Last edited:
- Awards
- 19
You say "preposterous," "high horse" and "shame" a lot.
And that turned out well.
And that turned out well.
- Awards
- 8
As opposed to what?
And The US removed Iraq from Kuwait, and that did turn out well,
considering that it bordered Saudi Arabia, and Saddam Hussein would have control over
a huge share of the world's oil.
If it fits
Last edited:
- Awards
- 19
"There are two kinds of people in this world. Avoid them both."
-- Arthur Schopenhauer
-- Arthur Schopenhauer
- Awards
- 8
Does that include you
- Awards
- 19
I hope so.
- Awards
- 6
Canada was invaded long ago and again, by the US. How did that go for you?
Do you know anyone in the military or who served alongside Canadian troops? They've been taken lightly many times and every time those who lived to tell about it, told how fierce and smart the Canadians were.
In the World Wars (you know, when Canada was involved long before the US), Canadian troops were often sent in as the guinea pigs to take on heavy fire and hopefully weaken the enemy enough, the Europeans and Americans could avoid mass casualties. Instead, the brave Canadians often ended up winning the battles. Take a crash course on Vimy Ridge for one example.
You would do well to avoid falling into the trap of insulting and pushing away your allies. You'll likely need us again. We're just damned well stubborn and stupid enough to come to your defense again. Fortunately for you we're quite savvy and smart too.
Oh here we go...the US did it all alone and the allied forces (which included Canada in that Iraq version btw) didn't help at all. I bet you likely think the US invented the nuclear bomb all by yourselves too (not that I'm proud of Canada's involvement).
I essentially said the spiritual after life I like to believe in wouldn't have Charlie Kirk sitting beside Jesus as a person to praise. In essence, I like to believe the innocent children of the world who died by violent, senseless means would be the ones Jesus would surround himself with. If that makes me insensitive I guess I wear that badge with honour.
I'm not the one who turned this thread into a Canada hating thread though. I'll let you counsel your inner soul for that one.
- Awards
- 8
You are the one who turned this into a thread which your postings odiously disrespected a woman with two small children who just lost her husband tragically
and her husband whose great flaw was ... you don't agree with him
That is not only insensitive, but callous, cruel and repugnant.
There is nothing honorable about that
It not a Canada demeaning thread. You simply don't like it when the facts destroy your ultra left narrative
An extremely narrow and maybe 99% incomplete recounting of history. Laughable
Battle of the Bulge?
Battle of Britain?
Pretty sure it was the USa and England that did the heavy lifting
And you would do well to stop insulting the American people, or at the large group that you vilify constantly, simply because you do not agree with them
The US led the international coalition overwhelmingly by troop numbers
I have to check, but the numbers are approximately 697,000 US troops
and 4,600 Canadian troops.
Nobody is talking about the Nuke - deflection on your part, it has nothing to do with anything
Coalition of the Gulf War - Wikipedia
Last edited:
- Awards
- 6
Where exactly are your facts you continue to brag about.
Ultra left narrative....because I support sensible gun laws. This is almost laughable but that would be callous of me to say apparently.
You are aware that Canada participated significantly in all of those battles, right. Canadians just get lumped in with the RAF and US battalions.
Where exactly did I insult the American people again? I'm pretty sure the facts show you insulted Canadians in this thread.
Pot meet Kettle with the vilification of an entire group of people.
Keep telling people how smart and full of receipts you are. Eventually even you might believe what you say.
Keep demeaning your allies too. It seems like a recipe to MAGA for sure.
- Awards
- 8
I did provide Gulf War facts and sourced them.
WW2 facts are widely available, and I named some items
You provide ZERO facts
You completely misrepresented the Florida Law - I read it.
The economy was probably the major factor in the 2024 election. Many facts, figures, polls confirm it
It is easily found on search engines
Ultra Left narrative is self-evident
You insult the American people continually when you refer to right of center people by vile names, talk about pre-existing biased used for political purposes (like the left doesn't do it) simply because you don't agree
My research skills are excellent, developed both educationally and professionally.
If you don't like the verifiable results, that is too bad.
I am not insulting Canada. I am simply trying to point out that Canada benefits from being America's neighbor, perhaps quite largely
You do vilify entire groups of Americans,
I believe what I say because I have researched it and gathered the facts.
USA is not demeaning our allies. We are leading NATO,
and we expect our allies to fulfill their obligations.
Like it or not, Canada has not contributed their agreed upon percentage.
And you have shown no compassion for the Kirks
Last edited:
- Awards
- 6
You feel really threatened by me don't you. It certainly can't be my propensity for violence, given that I'm an "ultra leftist" which means I believe in common sense gun laws, due process and not killing innocent people among other things.
The Gulf War was an American war for Middle East oil control. It most certainly wasn't about liberating Kuwait. Why would Canada provide tens of thousands of troops for that?
Since you strangely like Wikipedia for your "facts and research" prowess, here you go:
Canada in World War II - Wikipedia
Something different:
The Battle of Britain: Fighting for Freedom - Canada.ca
Waged from July to October 1940, The Battle of Britain pitted a small group of Allied fighter pilots against a far larger German air force – the Luftwaffe.
Canada benefits from being a peace advocate and not trying to pretend we're saving the world one oil well at a time. If anything being beside the US makes it more dangerous for us and a constant supply of guns and drugs comes from the US
What's the point of contributing more money to NATO when it's proven to be completely useless and feckless at keeping Europe safe from Russian aggression?...especially since TACO came to power again and refuses to hold Russia accountable for anything. The money just gets siphoned to corrupt war machines.
Last edited:
- Awards
- 8
You want sources other than wikipedia?You feel really threatened by me don't you. It certainly can't be my propensity for violence, given that I'm an "ultra leftist" which means I believe in common sense gun laws, due process and not killing innocent people among other things.
The Gulf War was an American war for Middle East oil control. It most certainly wasn't about liberating Kuwait. Why would Canada provide tens of thousands of troops for that?
Since you strangely like Wikipedia for your "facts and research" prowess, here you go:
Canada in World War II - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Something different:
The Battle of Britain: Fighting for Freedom - Canada.ca
Waged from July to October 1940, The Battle of Britain pitted a small group of Allied fighter pilots against a far larger German air force – the Luftwaffe.www.canada.ca
Canada benefits from being a peace advocate and not trying to pretend we're saving the world one oil well at a time. If anything being beside the US makes it more dangerous for us and a constant supply of guns and drugs comes from the US
What's the point of contributing more money to NATO when it's proven to be completely useless and feckless at keeping Europe safe from Russian aggression?...especially since TACO came to power again and refuses to hold Russia accountable for anything. The money just gets siphoned to corrupt war machines.
OK https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/which-countries-were-involved-in-the-gulf-war.html
Remembering The Gulf War: Key Facts And Figures About The Conflict
It was the biggest deployment of the UK Armed Forces since the Second World War.
Persian Gulf War | Summary, Dates, Combatants, Casualties, Syndrome, Map, & Facts | Britannica
Persian Gulf War, conflict (1990–91) triggered by Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait with the apparent aim of acquiring its large oil reserves, canceling a large debt owed to Kuwait, and expanding Iraqi regional power. A U.S.-led invasion ended Iraq’s occupation and required Iraq to divest of its weapons...
www.britannica.com
Countries Compared by Military > Gulf War Coalition Forces. International Statistics at NationMaster.com
Number of troops who served on active duty in the Gulf War theater of operations between August 2, 1990, and June 13, 1991.
www.nationmaster.com
And wiki does indicate the source of its data
I feel what by You? LOL LOL LOL LOL.....LOL
Canada doesn't have the option of being a "peace advocate" (not sure that they are) without the USA.
In danger from the US is preposterous
Canada would probably have been a Russian colony long ago without the USA
Russia Ukraine does not prove NATO to be ineffective.
Far from it. 32 countries in NATO. https://www.studyiq.com/articles/nato-countries/ (notice its not Wiki)
And the US cannot hold Russia accountable by itself.
The President recently convened the other countries and they offered minimal, if any support - again, you are factually wrong
So when it suits you, you want the US to be the big one on the block - how ...contradictory?
So when the President does involve the other leaders and they do not support efforts against Russia, you ignore it because it does not suit your narrative
Canada made a commitment to contribute. They failed to do so percentage wise
If you think oil is so unimportant, than you won't mind paying higher prices - much higher prices without
R &D, and developing new sources
And without intervention in the Gulf War, Hussein would control the oil in Iraq, Kuwait, and could have invaded Saudi Arabia.
You seriously think that would be beneficial
You are so wrong about that, it is staggering
You are off topic again. This thread is about the Kirks
Last edited:
- Awards
- 6
Threatened. That's right, threatened by my Canadian public high school education that taught me how to do research and post links as "facts" too.
Ummm say what??? When does the US promote peace? Like, ever???
Canada has way more friends than just the US...and if you're our friends right now, I'm not sure what an enemy is.
Though once again you forgot to research NORAD and like to forget Canadian engineers got the US on the moon but let's just pretend the US is solely responsible for everything positive in the world and that Canada could easily be taken over by Russia. Remind me again how it's going for Russia in Ukraine.
I've brought the topic back to the Kirks multiple times. You just feel so threatened you feel compelled to insult Canada in response.
I wonder how Charlie would feel about his great friend TACO trying to stifle free speech in response to his murder. Likely not too good.
- Awards
- 8
Public School education - clearly you are ready to join MENSA
The USA has to do the heavy lifting to maintain peace.
Freedom isn't free
The rest of the world is not going to stop some very bad things
Were the atrocities in Kosovo going to stop if the US did not intervene?
That is promoting peace ultimately.
Communism did not fall because of happenstance.
The US had to do the heavy lifting, and many nations were freed
You won't answer that, conveniently because it does not fit your false narrative
So again, you disparage America and the American people Canada doesn't have friends. The other countries only respect Canada because it is US northern neighbor.
And the Ukraine seems like it is far more resistant than Canada, based on what you say.
And Ask Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Czechoslovakia, Hungary etc about how effective they were against Russia.
And again, I am not insulting Canada.
I am merely pointing out that it benefits from proximity to the US
And you didn't answer why the other nations would not support the President in his attempts to hold Russia accountable
And again, you disrespected the Kirks - worse than disrespected them.
This thread is about the Kirks.
Get back on topic
No you have not returned to topic, at least not constructively
Maybe you can utilize that public school education
And free speech is alive and well, as evidenced by the many unbelievable comments by people like you about the Kirks.
There are PRIVATE employers who can hire and fire based on anything. That is not government regulation,
but maybe you would know that if you actually read Decisions on First Amendment Issues
Last edited:
- Awards
- 6
Yes, right behind you and your great researching prowess that you boast about. Clearly you didn't catch my humility when I spoke about a high school education lol.
You mean when NATO intervened, right?
Was that when the US threatened to annex Greenland from Belgium or annex Canada??
Bottom line is the US takes all of the credit and never any blame.
I disparage Americans who believe in violence, corruption and illegal invasion. I'm quite balanced in that opinion...feeling the same way about anyone else from any other country with the same flaws (including my own).
Canada doesn't have friends lmao...
Most Loved Countries In The World
Why do Americans wear Canadian flags while travelling abroad? Popular opinion names Canada as the best country worldwide
www.worldatlas.com
Are you implying that we want to be taken over by Russia? That doesn't even make sense
Let's speak about actual facts. The US benefitted from Canada's proximity when 9/11 happened and your planes needed a safe, trustworthy place to land. Canadians fed and sheltered tens of thousands of stranded Americans. When has the US done the same for Canada?
Canada's close proximity allows our water bombers to help with your forrest fires, our electrical companies to send trucks and personnel after hurricanes, etc. You're welcome.
This forum is owned by a European last I knew. If it were owned by an American it would likely be forced offline in these radical, anti free speech times being implemented by the US government.
The government FCC chair regulates business mergers and is threatening those mergers by blackmailing them into capitulation to TACO. If you're okay with that you likely never listened to Charlie Kirk as a fan.
Last edited:
- Awards
- 8
Kosovo - NATO is led by the US, and there would have been no intervention without the uS
And I thought you didn't want to fund NATO
"Was that when the US threatened to annex Greenland from Belgium or annex Canada??
Bottom line is the US takes all of the credit and never any blame."
Credit /Blame fir what?
I think it was Denmark actually, and it was clearly not to be taken seriously, and it has nothing to do with this thread,
or anything I said
Canada benefits far more from the US than vice versa. That is not demeaning Canada, that is just reality
I could name the benefits all day and all month, but it wouldn't make a difference, since you just don't care about anything other than your narrative.
And again, America is the reason that Canada is a free country, because Canada receives the benefit of the American Defense.
And Canada needs the US, no matter what you think
"This forum is owned by a European last I knew. If it were owned by an American it would likely be forced offline in these radical, anti free speech times being implemented by the US government.
The government FCC chair regulates business mergers and is threatening those mergers by blackmailing them into capitulation to TACO. If you're okay with that you likely never listened to Charlie Kirk as a fan.'
You are creating a straw man. The First Amendment prevents the government from enacting certain laws against free speech. Forums that are not government owned are not subject to the same. I am guessing you had no issues when another major social media posts was banning right leaning posts, based on pressure from people who share your agenda. And there are always multiple complications with mergers that the public doesn't even know about
And you didn't answer why the leaders of other countries did not agree to support the President to bring about change to Russia.
You want the US to do the heavy lifting when it suits you, but otherwise, you just villify the US and the American people ( at least the ones who don't agree with you"
And again, this thread is about the Kirks. Please return to topic
Kosovo - NATO is led by the US and there would have been no intervention without the USYes, right behind you and your great researching prowess that you boast about. Clearly you didn't catch my humility when I spoke about a high school education lol.
You mean when NATO intervened, right?
Was that when the US threatened to annex Greenland from Belgium or annex Canada??
Bottom line is the US takes all of the credit and never any blame.
I disparage Americans who believe in violence, corruption and illegal invasion. I'm quite balanced in that opinion...feeling the same way about anyone else from any other country with the same flaws (including my own).
Canada doesn't have friends lmao...
Most Loved Countries In The World
Why do Americans wear Canadian flags while travelling abroad? Popular opinion names Canada as the best country worldwide
Are you implying that we want to be taken over by Russia? That doesn't even make sense
Let's speak about actual facts. The US benefitted from Canada's proximity when 9/11 happened and your planes needed a safe, trustworthy place to land. Canadians fed and sheltered tens of thousands of stranded Americans. When has the US done the same for Canada?
Canada's close proximity allows our water bombers to help with your forrest fires, our electrical companies to send trucks and personnel after hurricanes, etc. You're welcome.
This forum is owned by a European last I knew. If it were owned by an American it would likely be forced offline in these radical, anti free speech times being implemented by the US government.
The government FCC chair regulates business mergers and is threatening those mergers by blackmailing them into capitulation to TACO. If you're okay with that you likely never listened to Charlie Kirk as a fan.
And I thought you didn't want to fund NATO
"Was that when the US threatened to annex Greenland from Belgium or annex Canada??
Bottom line is the US takes all of the credit and never any blame."
Credit /Blame fir what?
I think it was Denmark actually, and it was clearly not to be taken seriously, and it has nothing to do with this thread,
or anything I said
Canada benefits far more from the US than vice versa. That is not demeaning Canada, that is just reality
I could name the benefits all day and all month, but it wouldn't make a difference, since you just don't care about anything other than your narrative.
And again, America is the reason that Canada is a free country, because Canada receives the benefit of the American Defense.
And Canada needs the US, no matter what you think
"This forum is owned by a European last I knew. If it were owned by an American it would likely be forced offline in these radical, anti free speech times being implemented by the US government.
The government FCC chair regulates business mergers and is threatening those mergers by blackmailing them into capitulation to TACO. If you're okay with that you likely never listened to Charlie Kirk as a fan.'
You are creating a straw man. The First Amendment prevents the government from enacting certain laws against free speech. Forums that are not government owned are not subject to the same. I am guessing you had no issues when another major social media posts was banning right leaning posts, based on pressure from people who share your agenda. And there are always multiple complications with mergers that the public doesn't even know about
And you didn't answer why the leaders of other countries did not agree to support the President to bring about change to Russia.
You want the US to do the heavy lifting when it suits you, but otherwise, you just villify the US and the American people ( at least the ones who don't agree with you"
And again, this thread is about the Kirks. Please return to topic
Last edited:
- Awards
- 19
Count Dracula slaughtering hundreds of thousands, the American politicians and media enthusiastically justifying all of it -- labeling Dracula "the victim" as he demands, with the corporations ready to swoop in over the sea of corpses in order to divide the spoils.
If we wonder how Hitler happened...
If we wonder how Hitler happened...
- Awards
- 6
You first.
I feel horrible for Mrs. Kirk and her children.
I feel worse for our country.
As far as all the "canceling" that's going on right now -
Private employers are free to fire and punish their employees for their speech.
Having said that, anyone who isn't worried about the attorney general promising prosecutions for what she deems as "hate speech" or about the head of the FCC openly bragging about threatening media companies to bend to the administration's will clearly has no respect for our Constitution.
- Awards
- 6
I support NATO I just don't support increasing funding while they're turning their backs on Ukraine.
You couldn't name one time the US came to Canada's defense. You also import more of our products because you need them more than we need yours.
We're currently increasing trade with Mexico, Asia and Europe...even shipping LNG overseas.
The US is becoming an isolated, distrusted regime that's hated. It will take years to walk that damage back.
You said it was Canada's proximity, we had no friends, weren't respected and you're the reason for our existence.
You ignored the link to Canada being voted the most respected country in the world in 2025. The US wasn't even top 20.
If Canada is great because of our proximity to the US, why do you want a big wall built between yourselves and Mexico? Didn't that greatness via proximity rub off on them (I like Mexican people).
You're ignoring what's actually happening. Please remind me of the social media platform banning right wing speech.
TACO is using stall tactics to avoid punishing Russia. Mr "two weeks" TACO has no intentions of ever going against Papa Putin.
Charlie Kirk debated for a living and the "prove me wrong" slogan. I think it's okay.
You're just too consumed with telling me how smart and great at research you are and your country is the reason for all things good in the world.
It's been my experience in life that when someone has to tell you how great they are, they're usually very insecure. You and "two weeks" TACO are very insecure.
Last edited: