I've always felt Frasier was the smartest sit-com ever. It oozes intellectual (and funny) writers.
Yes, it definitely appeals to people with a certain type of humour.I enjoyed Frasier and I'm interested in checking out the reboot, but I always felt much of its fanbase were a bit pretentious. I guess that fits with the theme of the show, though.
Yes, that's correct.I suppose the premise of Frasier now being the old man to his own son is one I should have seen coming. Am I correct in inferring that he's moved back to Boston?
I have to agree. Cheers was, and always will be, in a class by itself for me. I never did feel the same about Frasier, although I have to say the show was way more successful than most could’ve anticipated. At the time I expected it to last only a season or two and obviously I was wrong.Cheers was my personal favorite of the two shows, if only because there was a more "everyman" feel to it. Of course, we're really comparing apples to oranges here.
I thought the same thing when I read this. Returning to Boston may give us a few interesting cameos, perhaps even some scenes in a certain bar. The nostalgic part of me kind of likes this idea.I like the idea of him returning to Boston though - sets up lots of possible reunion episodes.
Frasier set the standard for the humble character comedy. It has never been bettered. This reboot will not tarnish that legacy but I doubt whether it’s likely to enhance it any. I expect it to be good but the casting already appears slightly askew. We’ll see.
I think Martin would also seem unfunny out of context. Hopefully, the Frasier-Freddy dynamic will be just as productive.Watching the latest trailer, I feel the Freddy character will bring the show down. He seems very unfunny.
I hope we'll get to see a healthy dose of Lilith.
Agree somewhat. Frasier's humor was more dry, for lack of a better descriptionI enjoyed Frasier and I'm interested in checking out the reboot, but I always felt much of its fanbase were a bit pretentious. I guess that fits with the theme of the show, though.
Cheers was my personal favorite of the two shows, if only because there was a more "everyman" feel to it. Of course, we're really comparing apples to oranges here.
Paramount also dropped an actual trailer for the reboot, and it's enough to make me want to check it out:
I think Martin would also seem unfunny out of context. Hopefully, the Frasier-Freddy dynamic will be just as productive.
Totally agree with you on Lilith, though.
Yes, I agree with that. I didn't mind the Woody/Rebecca years, but it was better when Coach and Diane were there.Agree somewhat. Frasier's humor was more dry, for lack of a better description
Cheers was the never the same after Nicholas Colasanto passed and Shelly Long departed, IMHO.
Actually, Shelly Long added more of a "Frasier-type" element to the show,, that was not replaced until...Frasier!
I enjoyed her character, but I can understand how people could find her unlikeable.Never thought the Carla character was funny - just mean, unlikeable and bitter
Yes, and he always had a great response when asked how life was going for him.George Wendt is always fun to watch.
Yes, and I believe they both ended up appearing on the show in bit parts too.Trivia - Fred Dryer (Hunter, former football player) was originally considered for Sam
Not sure, but I understand Julia Duffy was considered for Diane
Yes. If anything, the reviews I've read have leaned more on the negative side.From what I have read, reviews are mixed. I just don't think it is going to work
This sounds eerily like another continuation. Replace Frasier with Dallas (TNT) and you've summed up everything that was either right or wrong about that. The trailer for this Frasier seems a little off to me...pass.I don't think the reviews for this was ever going to be good to be fair - either they would do the same old Fraiser and come off as hopelessly old fashioned, or try to do something different which would sit wrong with fans. We'll see which way they lean into this.
Few things in life are as awful as the Murphy Brown revival. The fact that they admitted they revived the show only because Trump became president was more than obvious, as every episode served as a heavy-handed critique of him and his supporters. I don't say that as a Trump fan, and I certainly don't think any politician is beyond reproach. However, I prefer political humor that is clever and funny. Like the late night talk shows of the time, the Murphy Brown revival went with hacky and lame instead. They chose to go with these one-sided caricatures. I remember one episode had an obvious stand in for Steve Bannon named Ed Shannon. LOL, get it? Their last names rhyme in case the portrayal wasn't on the nose enough! So yeah, that revival was a dud.I was horrified to read one reviewer liken it to the Murphy Brown revival. If it is even a fraction as bad as that MB fiasco, I'll have to steer clear.
The fact that they admitted they revived the show only because Trump became president was more than obvious,