#metoo

[Willie Oleson]

or is it the gaudy variety most people are familiar with?

They're reading books, so unless it's a very provocative and raunchy book I assume it's all kids-friendly.

Mother Goose sounds far less controversial than, say, a random drag performer dressed like a contestant on Ru Paul's Drag Race

Why not an extravagant, glittery fairy godmother?

What's next? DYNASTY will damage children?

 

[Frank Underwood]

They're reading books, so unless it's a very provocative and raunchy book I assume it's all kids-friendly.

Why not an extravagant, glittery fairy godmother?

As I added to my post, I think any child-centered character is okay. I ultimately believe it's the context and the motivation behind it that matters.

Some people like being taboo and courting controversy for the fun of it. As long as it's actually about the children and not the performer's own narcissism, I think it's fine.

What's next? DYNASTY will damage children?

Why not? It's damaged plenty of adults.

 

[Willie Oleson]

I ultimately believe it's the context and the motivation behind it that matters.

It was established with a certain goal therefore I don't understand why there should be confusion about context and motivation.

I like to think they can explore these themes in addition to the more traditional stuff that is basically everywhere.
Now, if the kids would all run away screaming in fright and disgust then obviously it wouldn't work.