- Awards
- 11
" Attractive" is very subjective, of course. Out if the 1980s prime time soaps whom would you consider not a person you would normally find attractive, but they just had that certain something that put them in that category for you?
Men and ladies.I never found Clay or Rob Lowe particularly attractive (give me Chad any day --- although I think something's wrong with him).
Joe Penny is more attractive to me than any of them (although he admits he's too bitchy to live with).
The Dukes had a certain appeal.
I didn't care all that much for Luke on DYNASTY, but his hair was a major issue; he's grown on me though.
I rather liked Prince Michael Praed -- even though a lot of people don't.
Lorenzo and Billy on FC were attractive enough, though quite different.
Tom Selleck had that Sun in Aquarius/Capricorn Rising thing like Clark Gable. But it's not for me.
Are we discussing ladies, too?
Why do you think they should have recast Ray because he was "70s?" I'm just curious. Ray had the "it " factor imho.I think KNOTS' Peter Hollister and PAPER DOLLS' Wesley Harper had that very pretty 80s look without being actually sexy.
Ray Krebbs could really only be attractive in 70s DALLAS, they should have recast him.
So pretty (for real!)
View attachment 37837View attachment 37838View attachment 37839
No pets? How about Lance's falcon Apollo? Apollo was soooo "it" that they cast Apollonia to accommodate his diva demands.Ok, I mentioned men and women. What can I say? I'm a people person![]()
Ray Krebbs could really only be attractive in 70s DALLAS, they should have recast him.
So pretty (for real!)
View attachment 37837View attachment 37838View attachment 37839
I didn't mean that Andrew Stevens shoulda been Ray Krebbs 2.
If you continue to argue with me I will tell the whole forum about the Andrew Stevens pin-up posters on your bedroom wall.
I know things....